The CARDboard - The FREE and independent site for Stanford Cardinal sports fans

In search of scores on the road

So there’s a team on campus that lost its offensive leader, one of its most valuable playmakers, and a couple of solid senior defenders. Now it’s having trouble scoring on the road, as other teams load up their defenses to put pressure on our offense to take long shots over the top rather than a more methodical short passing game.

I’m of course talking about the women’s soccer team.

Tonight they face off, #1 vs #2, Stanford vs UCLA in Los Angeles at 6:00 pm on the Pac-12 network. Give it a watch, but if you were basing your expectations off of last season’s team, be prepared to be frustrated.

The Cardinal hasn’t been able to replace Lindsay Taylor up front, Kirsty Zurmuhlen in the defensive midfield and Cami Levin on the back line, but most especially they have no one to take the place of attacking central midfielder and playmaker Teresa Noyola.

Those issues have to a certain extent been disguised by the excellent play of the senior defenders, Alina Garciamendez and Rachel Quon, keeper Emily Oliver and most especially by defensive central midfielder Mariah “Clutch” Nogueira. But there is little connection through the midfield to the front line; while Nina Watkins has taken on some of the defensive duties of Zurmuhlen, she doesn’t seem to be able to convert tackles into balls going forward as well as Kirsty did.

At attacking center mid, Alex Doll seems a bit lost, and Stanford has had a couple of knocks to other players. Up front, Chioma Ubogagu, back from playing with the U-20 national team, and Courtney Verloo form a potent outside combination on the left and right, but I think Lo LaBonta is playing a bit out of position at center forward; she would be much more natural at a “withdrawn striker” or as an attacking center mid.

There have been some great moments this year, but almost all of them have come through Nogueira, Garciamendez or Quon. Late in tight games, if Stanford needs to score, they end up moving forward into the attack. They do it well, but that also leaves Stanford open to the counter, especially as the mids tend to not cycle back and cover as the defenders go forward.

Watch tonight’s game. Stanford’s offense seems to consist of playing the ball among the back five, reversing it until one of the outside backs, Quon or Laura Leidle, can move forward. Then the ball bypasses the midfield entirely, looking for either Verloo or Ubogagu out wide or LaBonta (who while marvelously skilled with her feet is neither very big nor very fast in the central forward role). Which leads in general to either Chi or Courtney trying to beat a double-team, or LaBonta launching a 35-yard shot in the vicinity of the goal.

That’s where Stanford misses Taylor; accuracy and finishing. As a team, Stanford is still in general outshooting its opponents by wide margins; the shots just are nowhere near the net.

In Friday’s game against what should have been an over-matched USC, Stanford had 8 shots in the first half, 1 of which was on frame.  Early in the second half, Stanford again was firing blanks high and wide.  Until late in the game, when Nogueira and Quon pushed up in the attack, and Stanford’s chances got more dangerous.

But that push up also changed the shape of Stanford’s defense, and SC had several good chances late in the game to score.  Most especially off a series of corner kicks, one of which ended up in the back of the net but was waved off for either a foul or offsides, it was difficult to tell.

How was the game rescued?  By Quon, who lofted a free kick from the half line onto the head of Nogueira at the top of the box.  Mariah flicked it on – directly into the path of an onrushing Garciamendez, who toe-poked the ball into the left-side netting, ending a 100+ minute nightmare in about 4 seconds of playing time.

Now, you can say what you want about the field – they played the game in the Coliseum, which meant the field was short and narrow, allowing SC to pack the defense and not allowing Stanford to spread the ball around.

But beyond that, the lack of threat and pressure in the midfield is allowing bad teams to stay with Stanford,  and good teams to threaten all of Stanford’s streaks.  Tonight, we’ll see how they fare against a very good team in the Bruins.

Because Stanford’s had it relatively easy thus far – most of their difficult games have been at home, the one exception being the early and great victory at Penn State.  Which was followed with a 1-0 loss.

It comes down to road scoring.  At home, Stanford has 32 goals in 10 games; away or neutral, 15 goals in 7 games.  And that is skewed by two 4 goal wins against weak opponents in UNC Greensboro and Arizona.  1-0 in 2 OTs at a mediocre SC.  2-1 and 1-0 against middle of the road Utah and Colorado.

What does it mean?  I’m not sure, but I’ll be watching tonight, because, despite star-studded recruiting classes, when Nogueira, Quon and Garciamendez graduate, I’m not sure where the team is going without them.  Nogueira is the leading goal-scorer despite being a defensive midfielder, and Garciamendez is tied for second despite being a central defender. Be sure to watch the corners and other set pieces, as that’s where we’re likely to score.

Viking Guy

Crow is a dish best served cold

A week after scoring no offensive touchdowns, the Cardinal offense returned home to score eight of them.

Statistically, Stanford came into the game with one of the least productive offenses is all the FCS (107th in total offense and 70th in scoring offense). Fans — including this blogger — were calling for coach David Shaw to replace quarterback Josh Nunes. Perhaps, it was in the face of this adversity, as much as in the face of the Wildcats’ defense, that the offense decided to show up.

Continue reading

Time for a Change

Does David Shaw have the courage to make a mid-season change as his coach, Dennis Green did?

In 1991, Stanford had quarterback who had lead the nation in completion percentage the year before. That quarterback, Jason Palumbis, had led the team in a rousing come-from-behind near miracle win against Cal in the Big Game the prior season.

However, in 1991, perhaps because of a shoulder injury, Jason had a sub 60 percent completion average and had thrown four interceptions and no touchdowns. The season was young, and many fans like me thought that he would eventually snap out of it. However, then coach Dennis Green said that the team could not wait to begin winning. So, he started a redshirt freshman quarterback. The freshman quarterback had stepped in and completed eight of ten passes for 124 yards during the fourth quarter of a loss to Notre Dame. That quarterback, Steve Stenstrom, was then installed as the starter, and his name is still in the Stanford record books.

Continue reading

Predicting the Football Season, Week-by-Week, Part Five

The main question for the team, going forward, is whether the offense can improve and to what degree. The pattern for the past three years has been the offense starting a bit slowly and then maturing into a juggernaut, though that was interrupted in 2011 due to the massive injuries sustained; if that pattern repeats, the team can feel pretty confident about its chances. If not—well, then, the defense basically needs to pitch a complete game every week, with little margin for error.

With the high degree of inexperience at so many places in the team, it’s hard to believe the offense will exhibit no progress; the question is the degree. It’s impossible to answer, really, which makes the guesswork exceptionally random. Still, we try:

It’s hard not to be positive, by the way, about the fact that Stanford opponents are unbeaten when not playing Stanford.

Continue reading

A couple of small Stanford advantages against USC

People can’t help but reference history when picking sports—in particular, replaying the last matchup of whenever these two particular teams met. It’s not the worst strategy to familiarize yourself, though like all tools turning it into a crutch is a bad idea.

People’s thinking, not unjustifiably, when analyzing the USC-Stanford matchup is that: a) it was close last time; b) USC returns the bulk of its influential players and Stanford does not; c) therefore USC will win, perhaps quite easily.

It’s worth asking why, however, the game was so close in the first place. There are a couple peculiarities about last year’s game that don’t seem likely to be as negative for Stanford this time around as last time.

Continue reading

What about the running game?

Stepfan Taylor

The big mystery to many fans after two games has been pretty simple: where’s the running game? The answer, however, is just as simple: the season is beginning, and this is roughly what happens every season. It’s just that, without the brilliance of Andrew Luck, the running game’s warm ups look a bit too deliberate.

But the 2012 edition of the running attack, as you can see below when comparing primary running backs, is the median of running attacks of the Harbaugh/Shaw era (2007 not considered).

Continue reading