Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Go Stanford!
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - JohnR34231 - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:06 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Go Stanford!
BC
Temperature at game time is 77 degrees. Doesn't look like there wil be any snow.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Didn’t know that the women’s water polo team went to China. Looks like a fun trip.
BC
Colorado elected to receive, so for a change we start the game playing defense.
BC
Defense looking as stout as it was against Arizona, I see.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
Sh-t through a goose
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Yikes. Wow that was a bad defensive series.
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:17 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Yikes. Wow that was a bad defensive series.
BC
Hopefully, we will do better against the non-scripted plays, because
the scripted plays worked like a charm.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
In 1983 I went to lunch with then Defense Coordinator Fred Von Appen. It was just before the season started and we asked how the defense looked. His response: “not very good. We’re small. But we make up for it because were slow.” We thought he was kidding and laughed. He wasn’t. They went 1-11.
That’s with this defense looks like to me at times soft and slow a really bad combination
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Treefence - 11-09-2019
It looked like Adebo had a chance to get a brobdingnagian pop on the QB, and he either whiffed or was protecting himself...
(11-09-2019, 01:18 PM)lex24 Wrote: In 1983 I went to lunch with then Defense Coordinator Fred Von Appen. It was just before the season started and we asked how the defects looked. His response: “not very good. We’re small. But we make up for it because were slow.” We thought he was kidding and laughed. He wasn’t. They went 1-11.
That’s with this defense looks like to me at times soft and slow a really bad combination
Sometimes it looks like we don't have enough players. On a lot of the 3 man rushes, we still had no gap control and lanes were wide open...
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019
Wow, that was a miserable defensive series.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
Minn gets late pick. Victory formation. Good for them!!
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Offense is looking good, with a nice variety of runs and passes and involvement of a lot of different players, including Jones and Peat.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
That was a fricking catch
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
I think Wilson May have had that. The play did not get reviewed, and we have to kick a field goal.
Nice kick by Sanborn, but field goals won’t be enough.
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
Well, the offense showed a lot on that drive. I don't think we will have issues
keeping up in terms of scoring.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:27 PM)lex24 Wrote: That was a fricking catch. But I hate rolling Costello out because he’s absolutely lousy at it. The pass as usual was late. If he throws it on time it’s an easy completion. It was a completion anyway why it wasn’t reviewed is beyond me
He did. If the Flippin throw was on time it would’ve been an easy catch but it was thrown late. As I said below why they roll Costello out is beyond me.
(11-09-2019, 01:27 PM)BostonCard Wrote: I think Wilson May have had that. The play did not get reviewed, and we have to kick a field goal.
Nice kick by Sanborn, but field goals won’t be enough.
BC
RE: lex24 - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:27 PM)lex24 Wrote: That was a fricking catch
Yes i think it was. Right leg was in when the ball got to him. Contra the announcers, it didn’t look like he bobbled it.
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019
Let's see if the D can get a stop this time. The Buffs moved the ball at will last series.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:30 PM)Austroturf Wrote: Let's see if the D can get a stop this time. The Buffs moved the ball at will last series.
I am very unimpressed by the defense’s tackling ability (or lack thereof).
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019
Tackling is just lousy.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:32 PM)Austroturf Wrote: Tackling is just lousy.
And they compound it by taking bad angles.
Nice stuff by Schauffer, though.
BC