Week 6 in opponents - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Week 6 in opponents (/thread-10154.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Week 6 in opponents (/thread-10154.html)
Re: Week 6 in opponents - FarmBoy - 10-12-2015
I always thought the PAC should have invited BYU instead of Utah. They make a excellent "villain" in athletics and a much larger fan base.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - 82lsju - 10-12-2015
(10-11-2015, 09:21 PM)winflop link Wrote:They are already halfway into the ACC not sure when that starts but IIRC they are playing 5 ACC opponents every year?
it started last year
Re: Week 6 in opponents - needle - 10-12-2015
Not sure I care at all, but my magic bullet to fix the Big 12 is to have the conference champ play Notre Dame/top-ranked independent on conference championship weekend.
It will never happen because of TV rights, but I think the Big 12 would be smart to at least make some overtures and see what happens.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - stupac2 - 10-12-2015
(10-12-2015, 04:54 AM)garvin link Wrote:Quote:Clearly they could invite, I dunno, SMU and Houston, but what would they add?
The Houston and Dallas TV markets.
You think either of those two add more TVs in those cities than Texas does? That seems wildly improbable to me.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - Kathy - 10-12-2015
Quote:cable carriage for the Longhorn Network has not been what was expected
Karma: The Longhorn Network destroyed the original Big 12.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - stupac2 - 10-12-2015
(10-12-2015, 11:24 AM)garvin link Wrote:It's not an either-or. Adding viewers in the No. 5 and No. 10 TV markets is always a good thing, bottom-line-wise. And yeah, there are lots of people in Texas who are not UT fans, which is why cable carriage for the Longhorn Network has not been what was expected.
From what I've read the most important thing is getting into new markets so you can increase your carriage fees. That's part of the reason the B1G added Rutgers and Maryland, they wanted those new markets. There wouldn't have been any real gaining adding, say, Miami (OH) or NIU, even though they might be about as competitive on the field.
But maybe that's all wrong, I don't know.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - fullmetal - 10-12-2015
BYU really ought to look into joining the conference where their Holy War rivals belong...the Pac-12. And maybe we can absorb Boise State for balance. *Cue sound of UW Huskies trembling in fear.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-12-2015
I think the reason that BYU was kept out, not to mention BSU, is that the Pac-12 wanted to keep the academic standards up. Colorado and Utah both have reasonable academic credentials (at least better than OSU, WSU, and ASU); Colorado is a member of the AAU (I thought Utah was, but I was wrong).
https://www.aau.edu/about/article.aspx?id=5474
BC
Re: Week 6 in opponents - stupac2 - 10-12-2015
I always thought BYU was kept out because they're a religious school.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - FarmBoy - 10-12-2015
I'm sure there were lots of reasons to keep them out. Not playing on Sundays, being anti-intellectual in areas that conflict with church doctrine, being a public lighting rod in general, lower academic prestige than some schools. But from an athletic standpoint, it would have been fun. I'm sure Utah's got great credentials academically and perhaps the Pac12 academics would prefer to have closer ties to them than the BYU folks, but I've known a lot of BYU folks who are high achievers and bright, though again, they can often be anti-intellectual.
It's in the past. I just look forward to a future Pac16 with the original Pac8 making up the western division.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - yvonne - 10-12-2015
US News is not the best source, but it's one source that attempts to be somewhat transparent in its methodology. That source has BYU ahead of all Pac-12 schools except Washington and the four California schools.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - FarmBoy - 10-12-2015
Quote:US News is not the best source, but it's one source that attempts to be somewhat transparent in its methodology. That source has BYU ahead of all Pac-12 schools except Washington and the four California schools.
Caveat, I'm no expert here, but I think the issue was not about the quality of undergrad students, which I think USNWR is a proxy for. BYU undergrad is competitive to get into and all else equal, I would take a BYU grad applying for a job over one from almost every other Pac12 school. I think the issue was around the research quality of the schools. BYU is mostly an undergrad school with MBA and Law Schools. They are not known for their research contributions. When this was discussed 4-5 years ago, I remember people discussing the fact that athletic revenue is dwarfed relative to money raised for academic research.As odd as it sounds, apparently the athletic alignment actually drives academic collaboration as well. And it was thought that BYU doesn't add a lot there, unless you're interested in research that supports the idea that the Native Americans are descendants of ancient Israelites or that Christ spent some time in North America.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - CTcard - 10-12-2015
(10-12-2015, 08:38 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:As odd as it sounds, apparently the athletic alignment actually drives academic collaboration as well.
That is something presidents like to say.
From time to time, particularly at expansion time, you hear presidents announce some kind of program for intra-conference research collaboration. So I am sure they exist.
However, after now quite several years at several large research universities, I have never been part of, seen, or heard a colleague mention any academic program driven by athletic conference affiliation.
Re: Week 6 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-12-2015
FWIW, Stanford and Cal have a combined MD/MPH program, where students get their MD from Stanford (a degree Cal doesn't offer) and their MPH at Cal (a degree Stanford doesn't offer). I'm not sure if that has anything at all to do with the athletic alignment, given that the same joint program exists with UCSF, but I thought it was worth mentioning.
BC
Re: Week 6 in opponents - Papa John - 10-13-2015
There's also the California Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate, which includes Stanford, C.al, UCLA and CalTech. Of course, CalTech isn't part of the Pac-12, but they do have a football connection to Stanford:
http://www.caltech.edu/news/1944-caltech-football-team-honored-hall-fame-725