The CardBoard
Stanford-Oregon game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-Oregon game thread (/thread-13035.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - 2 for 2028 - 11-12-2016

Pitt has chance to beat Clemson with a field goal.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 05:18 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Wow they misspelled Toby Gerhart (no d). P12 network production values....

They also spelled LaDainian incorrectly earlier: Ladanian.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - CompSci87 - 11-12-2016

Consolation TD.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - scorecard - 11-12-2016

Oregon doesn't look well-coached.  Even the Duck's push ups are sloppy after a TD.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

Well, that was fun. Gotta love when half the opponent's score is in garbage time and they still barely get half your score.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

Shaw said "phenomenal," drink.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 05:52 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:Shaw said "phenomenal," drink.

Way ahead of you there! Though I wish my half barrel were cold for this game.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

Let's all hope/pray that Thomas is okay and will play against Cal.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-12-2016

Apparently Thomas could've come back in but Shaw felt the game was out of reach: https://twitter.com/StanfordSports/status/797603560091308032

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 05:58 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=16088.msg179054#msg179054 date=1478998366]
Shaw said "phenomenal," drink.

Way ahead of you there! Though I wish my half barrel were cold for this game.
[/quote]

I haven't started yet, I've been saving my cheap crappy bourbon for the 120+ points ןɐɔ and Wazzu will put up.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 06:13 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Apparently Thomas could've come back in but Shaw felt the game was out of reach: https://twitter.com/StanfordSports/status/797603560091308032

That is very good news. 

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - French Rage - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 06:23 PM)martyup link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=16088.msg179062#msg179062 date=1478999585]
Apparently Thomas could've come back in but Shaw felt the game was out of reach: https://twitter.com/StanfordSports/status/797603560091308032

That is very good news. 
[/quote]

Yes, now we just need a freaking game time.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 05:58 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=16088.msg179054#msg179054 date=1478998366]
Shaw said "phenomenal," drink.

Way ahead of you there! Though I wish my half barrel were cold for this game.
[/quote]

We play elbows...

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - HisKneeWasDown - 11-13-2016

(11-12-2016, 05:26 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:[quote author=dabigv link=topic=16088.msg179046#msg179046 date=1478996301]
Wow they misspelled Toby Gerhart (no d). P12 network production values....

They also spelled LaDainian incorrectly earlier: Ladanian.
[/quote]
Pac12 N sucks

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ChicagoCard - 11-13-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:27 PM)ChicagoVisitor link Wrote:[quote author=Phogge link=topic=16088.msg178993#msg178993 date=1478993046]
Costello just announced that he is transferring.

Terrible joke.[/quote]

I was just saying that in a banter-ish sort of way.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - JohnR34231 - 11-13-2016

(11-13-2016, 04:37 AM)ChicagoVisitor link Wrote:[quote author=ChicagoVisitor link=topic=16088.msg178999#msg178999 date=1478993244]
[quote author=Phogge link=topic=16088.msg178993#msg178993 date=1478993046]
Costello just announced that he is transferring.


Terrible joke.[/quote]

I was just saying that in a banter-ish sort of way.
[/quote]

We laugh, but if Davis Mills is as good as advertised......

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Hurlburt88 - 11-13-2016

Lesson from this year has to be that QB depth--and thus competition--is critical 

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Stymie - 11-13-2016

(11-13-2016, 09:55 AM)hurlburt88 link Wrote:Lesson from this year has to be that QB depth--and thus competition--is critical 

We had 3 highly rated QBs this year, spread out nicely by age.  90+% of the Power 5 teams would have salivated over our brood, so depth was not the problem.  There was competition, by definition, and the coaching team made their decision and that decision has proved to be wrong.  I personally think that if Shaw had gone to Chryst from game 1, we might now be salivating about our prospects in the "pick 6" group for the FCB.  I see the future as follows:

--10-3 finish with a good bowl win
--Chyst taking us to FCB next year.  How far?  Who knows but we can dream....
--Chryst goes to play on Sunday next year and then we will have two and out years from Costello and then Mills and then we will all sleep happily ever after,,,,

Stymie

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - BostonCard - 11-13-2016

Don't forget Jack West after Mills.

But history shows that at least one and probably more of those QB's won't pan out.

BC

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Gauss - 11-13-2016

(11-13-2016, 11:31 AM)Stymie link Wrote:[quote author=hurlburt88 link=topic=16088.msg179131#msg179131 date=1479056102]
Lesson from this year has to be that QB depth--and thus competition--is critical 

We had 3 highly rated QBs this year, spread out nicely by age.  90+% of the Power 5 teams would have salivated over our brood, so depth was not the problem.  There was competition, by definition, and the coaching team made their decision and that decision has proved to be wrong.  I personally think that if Shaw had gone to Chryst from game 1, we might now be salivating about our prospects in the "pick 6" group for the FCB.
[/quote]

Hum, I would not be so sure. Chryst had no experience starting before this season, and for all we know, his command of the game could have been even worse than what he displayed against Arizona and OSU. I posit that had he started, we'd have lost 1 or perhaps 2 of the KSU-UCLS-U.SC gauntlet. Which together with the almost certain losses to UW and WSU (our lines were overmatched, partially due to injuries), would still have us at 7-3 or 6-4 at this point in the season.

David Shaw might have made the wrong choice at the beginning of the season (and even that is debatable), but the season might not have panned out very differently if he had not.