Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread (/thread-14247.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread (/thread-14247.html)
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
Needless to say, this is an important third down.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - martyup - 09-09-2017
Perez is in . . .
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
That would be USC's first punt of the game.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:49 PM)martyup link Wrote:Perez is in . . .
And we stopped them. Maybe he's the difference.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
That was their first punt right?
As bad as our defense has played, we're not out of this yet. I'd like to see a play action to a TE or something here. Don't think another run into a stacked box is the way to start this drive.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - martyup - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:50 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=17352.msg199838#msg199838 date=1505011778]
Perez is in . . .
And we stopped them. Maybe he's the difference.
BC
[/quote]
Perhaps
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- FINALLY, AN SC Punt - ADPATERSON - 09-09-2017
Good Def, Guys
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:50 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:That would be U$C's first punt of the game.
BC
I can hardly believe that's true and it's this close. And yes, I know we're down 11...
This is getting into "if we don't score here we're really screwed."
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:51 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17352.msg199839#msg199839 date=1505011823]
That would be U$C's first punt of the game.
BC
I can hardly believe that's true and it's this close. And yes, I know we're down 11...
This is getting into "if we don't score here we're really screwed."
[/quote]
Turnovers are keeping it close. But for the two interceptions, we might be down 42-14.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - martyup - 09-09-2017
How about a Little Sarell here?
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
Uh nevermind. Nice run BLove.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
Love was a shoestring away from taking it to the house again. Nice 14 yard run against a stacked line.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - JohnR34231 - 09-09-2017
If we can score on this drive we;'re back in it.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
OUr tackles again are not playing well.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Mick - 09-09-2017
Boys, it's spelled "P-L-A-YÂ A-C-T-I-O-N."Â Give it a try.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:54 PM)JPRI link Wrote:If we can score on this drive we;'re back in it.
Well we are facing a third and 18. nOt loking good.
And we get bailed out by another USC penalty.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
Another SC bailout. Never change SC.
And we did try a play action there on that series, just didn't work.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Mick - 09-09-2017
I'm tired of seeing five trojenz smother #5. I'll bet he's tired of it, too.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:55 PM)Mick link Wrote:Boys, it's spelled "P-L-A-YÂ A-C-T-I-O-N."Â Give it a try.
That post didn't age well.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- SC DEF Coord Out-coaching us - ADPATERSON - 09-09-2017
Clancy Pendergast (SC-DC) has called a superior defensive game.Â
They are stuffing us on the run. He is blitzing right, laying back to mix it up.
He is ahead of Shaw and Bloomgren.