Stanford-Cal game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-Cal game thread (/thread-13083.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-Cal game thread (/thread-13083.html)
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - stupac2 - 11-21-2016
(11-21-2016, 06:59 AM)CTcard link Wrote:Well, if he comes back it won't be because he doesn't have opportunities, it will be more along the lines of Luck returning because he wants to be with his mates and get a degree. I have never heard Christian make a comment indicating what he might wish to do - have heard his Dad indicate that a player should consider going when they have a shot.
I can't remember where this was, but sometime this offseason I saw him make an offhanded comment about being at Stanford for four years. But who knows? We'll find out early in January.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - Hurlburt88 - 11-21-2016
CHanging direction of topic . . .
It seemed to me that we got to the line faster this game--at the 15 second mark on the play clock in the first quarter, and between 12 & 15 seconds thereafter. I also think we had zero delays of game, and "only" one time-out to avoid a delay. Any other observations on this?Â
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - French Rage - 11-21-2016
(11-21-2016, 10:57 AM)hurlburt88 link Wrote:CHanging direction of topic . . .
It seemed to me that we got to the line faster this game--at the 15 second mark on the play clock in the first quarter, and between 12 & 15 seconds thereafter. I also think we had zero delays of game, and "only" one time-out to avoid a delay. Any other observations on this?Â
I noticed that too. I can't remember a single play when we went down to a few seconds on the play clock, whereas that's usually a very common occurrence.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-21-2016
There were several plays where the offense let the clock run down to *deep* single-digits, but they looked more in-control than previously -- as if it was by design rather than a symptom of panic.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - fullmetal - 11-21-2016
Yeah, there were some deliberate clock-bleeding snaps in the fourth quarter. But as mentioned before, they seemed controlled. Good for the offense; that's a fundamental.
Also yes, I think Stanford touched that onside kick first.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - JJJ - 11-21-2016
(11-21-2016, 09:17 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=16136.msg180094#msg180094 date=1479736781]Well, if he comes back it won't be because he doesn't have opportunities, it will be more along the lines of Luck returning because he wants to be with his mates and get a degree. I have never heard Christian make a comment indicating what he might wish to do - have heard his Dad indicate that a player should consider going when they have a shot.
I can't remember where this was, but sometime this offseason I saw him make an offhanded comment about being at Stanford for four years. But who knows? We'll find out early in January.
[/quote]
I believe that was his birthday tweet. Obviously, nothing definitive.
https://twitter.com/CMccaffrey5/status/740311075292217344
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - Hurlburt88 - 11-22-2016
I will cling to this tweet until all hope is definitively ripped away by McCaffrey himself!Â
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - fullmetal - 11-22-2016
Some one please rewatch the 2H of this game and remind me of the details of Webb cursing out his WR... :)Â I'm surprised I haven't seen anything about it online!
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread - JJJ - 11-22-2016
(11-22-2016, 09:49 AM)hurlburt88 link Wrote:I will cling to this tweet until all hope is definitively ripped away by McCaffrey himself!ÂWelcome to the club! 8)