Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread (/thread-14247.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread (/thread-14247.html)
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
I don't know that playcalling has had much to do with this game.
One team is dominating in the trenches, and that usually means a win.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Trevmiesterj - 09-09-2017
that has not worked all day. Terrible call.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - martyup - 09-09-2017
![[Image: thisistoomuch.gif]](https://www.hypable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/thisistoomuch.gif)
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- SC DEF Coord Out-coaching us - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:57 PM)ADPATERSON link Wrote:Clancy Pendergast (SC-DC) has called a superior defensive game.Â
They are stuffing us on the run. He is blitzing right, laying back to mix it up.
He is ahead of Shaw and Bloomgren.
Through three quarters, we have 160+ yards rushing on 7.1 yards per cary. Yes, that's helped by a 75 yard run, but we've gotten some decent gains otherwise, so it is hard to say that they are stuffing us on the run. Chryst is averaging 4.7 yards per attempt passing. I would say that our inability to mount much of a passing attack has hampered us more than the lack of a run.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Scott - 09-09-2017
I'm not exactly shocked the defense is outmatched here, but the OL has been just awful pass blocking. And my goodness has the play calling been bad, everything is telegraphed.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - Mick - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:57 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=Mick link=topic=17352.msg199852#msg199852 date=1505012133]
Boys, it's spelled "P-L-A-YÂ A-C-T-I-O-N."Â Give it a try.
That post didn't age well.
BC
[/quote]
That was a Hydrogen-7 post. Half life of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 08:00 PM)Scott link Wrote:I'm not exactly shocked the defense is outmatched here, but the OL has been just awful pass blocking. And my goodness has the play calling been bad, everything is telegraphed.
Playcalling always looks worse when you are getting dominated on the line of scrimmage.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - JohnR34231 - 09-09-2017
The defense gives us a couple of opportunities and we can't move the ball. Not looking good.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - cardcrimson - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:57 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=Mick link=topic=17352.msg199852#msg199852 date=1505012133]
Boys, it's spelled "P-L-A-YÂ A-C-T-I-O-N."Â Give it a try.
That post didn't age well.
BC
[/quote]
It might have if we could block. I've not seen our line so porous in years. Just awful.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - gocard14 - 09-09-2017
Agreed, but it's hard to blame Chryst for our lack of passing game. Pass blocking has been abysmal. 4 man rush with stunts is getting home quickly, and more importantly is putting pressure right in Chryst's face and not letting him step into throws. O line has to step it up.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
Feels like the only way we get back in this is a defensive score.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 08:01 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17352.msg199856#msg199856 date=1505012236]
[quote author=Mick link=topic=17352.msg199852#msg199852 date=1505012133]
Boys, it's spelled "P-L-A-YÂ A-C-T-I-O-N."Â Give it a try.
That post didn't age well.
BC
[/quote]
That was a Hydrogen-7 post. Half life of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
[/quote]
For what it is worth, I thought we were going to need to run some play action from time to time to keep the defense honest. Problem, of course, is that play action only works if your offensive line can hold a block for more than a second.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - OutsiderFan - 09-09-2017
Play Little and Sarell. Seriously.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- GEOG 20, NDAM 19 with 3m left - ADPATERSON - 09-09-2017
Bulldogs edged ahead @NDAM with 3min+ to go
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
My gawd. Buncom just got pwned.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- SC DEF Coord Out-coaching us - cardcrimson - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 07:59 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=ADPATERSON link=topic=17352.msg199857#msg199857 date=1505012254]
Clancy Pendergast (SC-DC) has called a superior defensive game.Â
They are stuffing us on the run. He is blitzing right, laying back to mix it up.
He is ahead of Shaw and Bloomgren.
Through three quarters, we have 160+ yards rushing on 7.1 yards per cary. Yes, that's helped by a 75 yard run, but we've gotten some decent gains otherwise, so it is hard to say that they are stuffing us on the run. Chryst is averaging 4.7 yards per attempt passing. I would say that our inability to mount much of a passing attack has hampered us more than the lack of a run.
BC
[/quote]
He has no time to throw. Several passes batted down.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-09-2017
That play is going to end up on the SC motivational video this week. Embarrassed several of our guys there.
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- SC DEF Coord Out-coaching us - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
(09-09-2017, 08:03 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:He has no time to throw. Several passes batted down.
Agreed. Partly poor blocking by the line. PArtly poor throwing by the QB.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-09-2017
At this point, we are going to get to see USC's blind snapper again.
BC
Re: Stanford vs. SC Game Thread -- S.Carr hurts us again - ADPATERSON - 09-09-2017
That was Simmons #2 on the FIRST whiff, then Buncom (#5).Â
Carr was a legit 5star out of H.S. -- has some shakes.Â
Out to the 30. DAMN! We needed a blocked punt near their end.