The CardBoard
Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread (/thread-12783.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

What a cluster


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

What a cluster


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I don't see the eye of the tiger in our guys.  Not good.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I don't see the eye of the tiger in our guys.  Not good.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I don't see the eye of the tiger in our guys.  Not good.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Let's see Burns back in there.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Let's see Burns back in there.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Let's see Burns back in there.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-30-2016

Bad TO right there but first-half TOs aren't super important... Still, with that playcall you should know what you're doing with the various outcomes.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-30-2016

Bad TO right there but first-half TOs aren't super important... Still, with that playcall you should know what you're doing with the various outcomes.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-30-2016

Bad TO right there but first-half TOs aren't super important... Still, with that playcall you should know what you're doing with the various outcomes.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Yeah, I know it is not Shaw's MO to go for it, but come on, he had to have known that barring a sack we were in two down territory

We better convert.  I hate to say it, but I have a horrible feeling about this.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Yeah, I know it is not Shaw's MO to go for it, but come on, he had to have known that barring a sack we were in two down territory

We better convert.  I hate to say it, but I have a horrible feeling about this.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Yeah, I know it is not Shaw's MO to go for it, but come on, he had to have known that barring a sack we were in two down territory

We better convert.  I hate to say it, but I have a horrible feeling about this.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Was that QB run a broken play?


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Was that QB run a broken play?


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Was that QB run a broken play?


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

I'm ok with the TO, I think Shaw was simply scouting UW's personnel response to his Ogres.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

I'm ok with the TO, I think Shaw was simply scouting UW's personnel response to his Ogres.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

I'm ok with the TO, I think Shaw was simply scouting UW's personnel response to his Ogres.