Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
dabigv13 - 10-07-2017
Didn't seem like a dirty play there. Good call.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
stupac2 - 10-07-2017
Huh, Blandino's explanation makes more sense, I guess targeting now includes a foul like spearing.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
martyup - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:38 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:Huh, Blandino's explanation makes more sense, I guess targeting now includes a foul like spearing.
That was worse than the call they made on Holder.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
teejers1 - 10-07-2017
Is there a worse play caller in D1 football than David Shaw (or whoever is calling the plays?
Seriously. So predictable. So pathetic.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
martyup - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:40 PM)teejers1 link Wrote:Is there a worse play caller in D1 football than David Shaw (or whoever is calling the plays?
Seriously. So predictable. So pathetic.
What's your call here Teejers1?
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
BostonCard - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:40 PM)teejers1 link Wrote:Is there a worse play caller in D1 football than David Shaw (or whoever is calling the plays?
Seriously. So predictable. So pathetic.
Whoever is calling the plays is getting us a 6.9 yard per play average, despite Love being mostly bottled up in this game.
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
CompSci87 - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:41 PM)martyup link Wrote:[quote author=teejers1 link=topic=17608.msg204872#msg204872 date=1507437615]
Is there a worse play caller in D1 football than David Shaw (or whoever is calling the plays?
Seriously. So predictable. So pathetic.
What's your call here Teejers1?
[/quote]
Something unpredictable, presumably.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
csfoster - 10-07-2017
Go for it!
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
martyup - 10-07-2017
I say play for field position and punt. Or, fake punt if it's there.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -- Start of Q4, Stanford up 16 - 13 on the road -
ADPATERSON - 10-07-2017
Need to go for it on 4th and 4. Win the game.
Fake it to Love, throw to TE
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
norcard - 10-07-2017
wasted 2 downs with runs up the middle
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
BostonCard - 10-07-2017
You know what else is predictable... Teejers complaining about the playcalling and calling it "predictable".
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
washingtonismoney - 10-07-2017
Offensively I have seen some wrinkles and adjustments for this game: QB keeping on zone reads; some "novelty"'plays (eg the opening brobdingnagian catch by K Smith in which an OL motioned out to be a wideout). That being said haven't hit pay dirt enough.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
cardfan77 - 10-07-2017
Perhaps another fake punt??
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
BostonCard - 10-07-2017
We are punting :(.
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
BostonCard - 10-07-2017
But Bailey gets it to go out of bounds at the 1. :)
Illegal procedure :(
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
martyup - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:45 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We are punting :(.
BC
And . . . a stupid penalty forces a re-kick.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
cardcrimson - 10-07-2017
Have we run play action against the ten in box? We should.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
stupac2 - 10-07-2017
What a punt!
...Wait? re-kick? Ugh.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread -
CompSci87 - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:44 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:You know what else is predictable... Teejers complaining about the playcalling and calling it "predictable".
Or if it's something odd you wouldn't ever have predicted, then it's an AYFKM play call.