Stanford ND game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford ND game thread (/thread-7932.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford ND game thread (/thread-7932.html)
Re: Stanford ND game thread - wbond - 10-04-2014
Our offense, from playcalling on down, is difficult to love.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - thunder_chik - 10-04-2014
Yes, with more than 1/3 of the season over, I think the coaching staff needs to take a hard look at game planning, play calling, etc. Our offense, despite the talent we have, is impotent.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - SamAtoms1980 - 10-04-2014
Shaw's endgame management has never been good. I don't see how it can improve any time soon.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - simscitizen - 10-04-2014
Lyons completely blew the coverage on 4th down. We were playing Cover 3. The cornerback has responsibility for the deep third and the linebacker takes the flat. Instead Lyons somehow took the flat. What a fail.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - JohnR34231 - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 04:13 PM)thunder_chik link Wrote:dabigv, yes, bad officiating, but we should be used to that by now (even EXPECT it). And bad officiating is part of the game. Williamson hasn't been on his game all season, but he should have had an accurate kick OUT OF THE END ZONE. That part of the game was under our control. Officiating, not.
We bi**ch about the officiating every time we lose a game. Am I the only one who thinks that is getting a little old?
Re: Stanford ND game thread - Oasis - 10-04-2014
Why do we go to a prevent defense when we have stopped them all day? They had three minutes. Why not just play our usual defense and stuff them?Even with that we had them down to one play and lose on a blown coverage. Now we'll get to hear Hotes drone on about the Wonderfulness of Notre Dame.Â
Re: Stanford ND game thread - wbond - 10-04-2014
I feel like I watched Mcconaughey Lincoln ads for nothing.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - 82 Card - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 04:18 PM)JPRI link Wrote:We bi**ch about the officiating every time we lose a game. Am I the only one who thinks that is getting a little old?
I resisted complaining about the refs for years. But with ND, there is a long pattern, regardless of whether we are playing home or away. With other schools, there are bad calls both ways that could be argued affected the game.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - thunder_chik - 10-04-2014
JPRI, you misinterpreted my post. I was not complaining about officiating; it is a widespread opinion that Pac 12 officiating is less than stellar. I stated that officiating, at whatever level, is part of the game and beyond any team's control. We need to control the parts of the game that we can, and the kicking game is one element under our control. Williamson helped lose the game with his bad kick. Lyons helped lose the game with his bad coverage/penalties. Overall, it doesn't really matter because, while we may have a playoff-caliber defense, our offense is impotent. We are in desperate need of some retooling.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - JohnR34231 - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 04:27 PM)82 Card link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=10786.msg100775#msg100775 date=1412464696]
We bi**ch about the officiating every time we lose a game. Am I the only one who thinks that is getting a little old?
I resisted complaining about the refs for years. But with ND, there is a long pattern, regardless of whether we are playing home or away. With other schools, there are bad calls both ways that could be argued affected the game.
[/quote]
Wait until the next time we lose a game. I hope it's later rather than sooner, but I guarantee there will be a thread bi**ching about the officiating. We lost this game because the offense couldn't get much done, and when they finally did, the defense couldn't hold the fort. End of story.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - 82 Card - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 04:33 PM)JPRI link Wrote:Wait until the next time we lose a game. I hope it's later rather than sooner, but I guarantee there will be a thread bi**ching about the officiating. We lost this game because the offense couldn't get much done, and when they finally did, the defense couldn't hold the fort. End of story.
There will always be complaining about refs. Most of the time, I will not join in. I even pointed out a call against Stanford that I thought the refs missed. I don't think the refs consciously set out to cheat for one team. However, with ND there is a consistent trend. I see the same thing when ND plays other teams.
That said, I think Stanford lost this game. The only reason the game was close enough for the refs to matter was because of some flubbed kicks probably caused by the weather. Both offenses looked horrible. ND's O was playing our D. Our O has no excuse.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - scorecard - 10-04-2014
I agree with 82 Card. During their run to the national title game, they got pivotal calls against BYU and Pitt, not to mention us.Â
I don't know how that replay call in particular is justifiable. Pellets jump off the field. His left hand does not come up under the ball, the ball bounces up to the chest, and the left hand is off to the side grabbing at air. Even the homer announcer Mayock said, "I would say that is clear and conclusive evidence ... that's not even close." And he is shocked when the call on the field is upheld. The worst part is that it costs us a timeout, which might have been useful at the end of the game.
Hogan's 2nd interception was a clear PI, when the DB runs into Montgomery before the ball arrives, and even that catch is not clean. But again, it is upheld.
I'm going to have a hard time figuring out who I want to lose more when they play FSU.Â
Re: Stanford ND game thread - Cardinal96 - 10-04-2014
Just remember. We were out gained almost 2:1. The refs weren't why we lost this.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - scorecard - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 05:19 PM)NYCCardinalFan link Wrote:Just remember. We were out gained almost 2:1. The refs weren't why we lost this.
You are correct, we were our own worst enemy. We were lucky to be in it. But it's pretty clear also that the refs did us no favors today.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - washingtonismoney - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 04:20 PM)Oasis link Wrote:Why do we go to a prevent defense when we have stopped them all day? They had three minutes. Why not just play our usual defense and stuff them?
Actually, we were playing our usual defense. The clear defensive gameplan was to rush three, drop eight, and see if Golson could figure it out. It was a decentish gameplan, though it clearly gave up 23 points.*
* (I don't give the D credit for those multiple botched FGs.)
Re: Stanford ND game thread - SamAtoms1980 - 10-04-2014
We need a new Andrew Luck Director of Offense
Re: Stanford ND game thread - Oasis - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 05:26 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=Oasis link=topic=10786.msg100776#msg100776 date=1412464829]Why do we go to a prevent defense when we have stopped them all day? They had three minutes. Why not just play our usual defense and stuff them?
Actually, we were playing our usual defense. The clear defensive gameplan was to rush three, drop eight, and see if Golson could figure it out. It was a decentish gameplan, though it clearly gave up 23 points.*
* (I don't give the D credit for those multiple botched FGs.)
[/quote]
Well, the commentators were saying Stanford was playing soft, playing back, not pressuring Golson. It seems to me that giving him time to throw (at least on most plays) was our undoing. I would've rushed five guys.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - washingtonismoney - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 06:08 PM)Oasis link Wrote:Well, the commentators were saying Stanford was playing soft, playing back, not pressuring Golson. It seems to me that giving him time to throw (at least on most plays) was our undoing. I would've rushed five guys.
I mean, that's nice, but we were doing that approach the entire game. This wasn't a new idea they dreamed up; it was the same ideas we were trying out the whole game.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - dabigv13 - 10-04-2014
Sometimes we rushed three but we often brought 4 or 5 as well. This was the perfect time to bring 5, when they NEED to make a longish throw.
Re: Stanford ND game thread - fullmetal - 10-04-2014
Did ND max protect on that play? Would 5 have helped?Â
Duane Akina needs to coach his DBs on how not to draw PI calls.