Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread (/thread-12707.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread (/thread-12707.html)
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Shades of Northwestern.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - AthleticsDynasty - 09-24-2016
Can some please please explain why the HELL Shaw let time run off before he called the timeout?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Someone has to explain this to me. What possible reason could there be?
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - shinsengumi - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 08:11 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:That may have been the backbreaker.4th and 1 - punt - that was the ball game! And the effects of that may last beyond just this game.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 08:12 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ok. Now that punt looks stupid.
It looked stupid at the time, too.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Stymie - 09-24-2016
I was hoping, at the very least, that Shaw used Bailey's athleticism to do a fake punt. But, no......
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Trevmiesterj - 09-24-2016
That decision to punt was basically like a turnover. Maddening.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016
Tremendous stop.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Well, we get the ball back without time to not go for it.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016
Don't need the timeouts anyway, 2:00 is plenty of time.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - JohnR34231 - 09-24-2016
I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - thunder_chik - 09-24-2016
Who woulda thunk that "opposing blogger" would come closest to the final score? Sheesh.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - jacketree - 09-24-2016
Shaw just burns 20 seconds for no good reason.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016
77 passing yards. Nauseating.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - shinsengumi - 09-24-2016
I'm confused... shouldn't the clock have stopped since the UCLA receiver went out of bounds?
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Kick catch interference.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - CrazedZooChimp - 09-24-2016
I'm...not sure I have faith we can run a 2 minute drive with no TOs...
Flag is a good start.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - martyup - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 08:15 PM)JPRI link Wrote:I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
I was thinking the same thing about the NW game.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - jacketree - 09-24-2016
Bust one for 70 out of Ogre?
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
The good news is that we can't be conservative.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016
Gotta run out of bounds there.