The CardBoard
Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread (/thread-12783.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

No pressure whatsoever.  Browning has forever.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

No pressure whatsoever.  Browning has forever.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Maybe we could put Browning in for a series.....


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Maybe we could put Browning in for a series.....


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Maybe we could put Browning in for a series.....


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:52 PM)BurgXXIII link Wrote:Well, they always say when you have two QBs, you have no QBs. Putting Chryst in in the toughest circumstance and expecting clean execution is asking too much. Maybe a few more series prior to this would have been a good idea.

I'm not sure who to crucify for that 4th down play, so I will just throw everyone under the bus.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:52 PM)BurgXXIII link Wrote:Well, they always say when you have two QBs, you have no QBs. Putting Chryst in in the toughest circumstance and expecting clean execution is asking too much. Maybe a few more series prior to this would have been a good idea.

I'm not sure who to crucify for that 4th down play, so I will just throw everyone under the bus.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:52 PM)BurgXXIII link Wrote:Well, they always say when you have two QBs, you have no QBs. Putting Chryst in in the toughest circumstance and expecting clean execution is asking too much. Maybe a few more series prior to this would have been a good idea.

I'm not sure who to crucify for that 4th down play, so I will just throw everyone under the bus.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Our guys look like they are giving up. Damn it!


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Our guys look like they are giving up. Damn it!


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Our guys look like they are giving up. Damn it!


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

Good no call, that ball appeared uncatchable.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

Good no call, that ball appeared uncatchable.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

Good no call, that ball appeared uncatchable.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Lucky that wasn't a PI.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Lucky that wasn't a PI.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

Lucky that wasn't a PI.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - yvonne - 09-30-2016

Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - yvonne - 09-30-2016

Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - yvonne - 09-30-2016

Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.