Stanford v. Utah live thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford v. Utah live thread (/thread-14498.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford v. Utah live thread (/thread-14498.html)
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - teejers1 - 10-07-2017
None of you will believe me, but pre-snap - on 2nd and 6 - I said, "give it to Love."Â (You'll note there was a WR wide).
He is an incredible talent.
I suspect he slowed down at the end because he is seriously beaten up.Â
We'll need one more big play from Love to get any kind of comfort.
BTW, as critical of the obvious plays as I've been, it should also be noted that the D has muffed a few "you gotta make that play" stops on D. Still, I like the way the D is "there" to make the plays.
P.P.S. A lot of time left in this one, but that TD was big.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - martyup - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 10:00 PM)ADPATERSON link Wrote:YEAH ! That's right, LOVE IT ! Score standing up ! 20-10 in Q4.
23-13
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - cardcrimson - 10-07-2017
Early prediction from next year's combine. Love shatters the record in the 40.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - BostonCard - 10-07-2017
Defense is stepping it up. That hold was pretty obvious.
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - CompSci87 - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 10:02 PM)teejers1 link Wrote:None of you will believe me, but pre-snap - on 2nd and 6 - I said, "give it to Love."Â
So, it was predictable. Terrible call then. :P
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - teejers1 - 10-07-2017
Stanford's D like the rest of us . . . thinking this game is in hand.Â
It is not.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - BostonCard - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 10:02 PM)teejers1 link Wrote:None of you will believe me, but pre-snap - on 2nd and 6 - I said, "give it to Love."Â (You'll note there was a WR wide).
He is an incredible talent.
I suspect he slowed down at the end because he is seriously beaten up.Â
We'll need one more big play from Love to get any kind of comfort.
BTW, as critical of the obvious plays as I've been, it should also be noted that the D has muffed a few "you gotta make that play" stops on D. Still, I like the way the D is "there" to make the plays.
P.P.S. A lot of time left in this one, but that TD was big.
You know Teejers... next year the teams are allowed to have one more coach on staff. You should consider applying.
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - FarmBoy - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 10:00 PM)ChicagoTree link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17608.msg204915#msg204915 date=1507438705]
Why did he slow down at the end? Could have had the ball knocked out.
Yes that would have been catastrophic.
[/quote]
My guess is he was winded. Elevation may be getting to him on longer runs.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - BostonCard - 10-07-2017
A turnover here would be nice.
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - phxfan - 10-07-2017
2nd and 18 that was terrible
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - teejers1 - 10-07-2017
The Utah coach sees the D alignment and exploits the formation weakness.
What a concept . . .
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - Mick - 10-07-2017
Sure do like that Phillips character. The DT who leads Stanford in tackles. A DT. Jeez.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - martyup - 10-07-2017
Suddenly we are not getting home. Too much time.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - stupac2 - 10-07-2017
I was looking forward to not playing Carrington this year...
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - csfoster - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 09:59 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:You're not Leon Lett. Don't stop running at the five. Great run though. And the streak continues.
He was watching the board. ;)
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - phxfan - 10-07-2017
our third down defense is lousy.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - stupac2 - 10-07-2017
It's nice when it's the other team burning a second-half TO to avoid a delay of game.
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - martyup - 10-07-2017
Anyone think that the play clock being "down" for this entire game is a bit suspect? It's well known that we push the play clock on almost every play.Â
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - BostonCard - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 10:07 PM)teejers1 link Wrote:The Utah coach sees the D alignment and exploits the formation weakness.
What a concept . . .
Utah: 317 yards on 60 plays, 5.3 yards per play; 13 points
Stanford: 373 yards on 45 plays, 8.3 yards per play; 23 points
What the copulation are you smoking?
BC
Re: Stanford v. Utah live thread - SamAtoms1980 - 10-07-2017
That Sweet Caroline commercial needs to just go away.