The CardBoard
Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread (/thread-12783.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

Was Burns hurt?  Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I hate commercials.  >:(


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I hate commercials.  >:(


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

I hate commercials.  >:(


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:58 PM)martyup link Wrote:Was Burns hurt?  Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?

Neither.  I assume it was the standard put Chryst in for the third drive of the game (we did it against KSU and UCLA); I assume Burns will be back in for this series.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:58 PM)martyup link Wrote:Was Burns hurt?  Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?

Neither.  I assume it was the standard put Chryst in for the third drive of the game (we did it against KSU and UCLA); I assume Burns will be back in for this series.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 06:58 PM)martyup link Wrote:Was Burns hurt?  Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?

Neither.  I assume it was the standard put Chryst in for the third drive of the game (we did it against KSU and UCLA); I assume Burns will be back in for this series.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Probably neither, just planned. TV said burns had some blood on his arm, but he didn't look injured.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Probably neither, just planned. TV said burns had some blood on his arm, but he didn't look injured.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

Probably neither, just planned. TV said burns had some blood on his arm, but he didn't look injured.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Rando - 09-30-2016

16 points is nothing.

We will come back and win


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Rando - 09-30-2016

16 points is nothing.

We will come back and win


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Rando - 09-30-2016

16 points is nothing.

We will come back and win


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Some of it's UW. They have a lot of speed, top shelf QB and great coach.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Some of it's UW. They have a lot of speed, top shelf QB and great coach.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - jacketree - 09-30-2016

Some of it's UW. They have a lot of speed, top shelf QB and great coach.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

WEll, someone is finally kicking off to McCaffrey.  Unfortunately, they are kicking off to him way too many times.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

WEll, someone is finally kicking off to McCaffrey.  Unfortunately, they are kicking off to him way too many times.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-30-2016

WEll, someone is finally kicking off to McCaffrey.  Unfortunately, they are kicking off to him way too many times.

BC


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

They're not even afraid of kicking it to McCaffrey. UW fully believes they're the better team.