The CardBoard
I have no words for McCaffrey - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: I have no words for McCaffrey (/thread-10946.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - fishman - 12-06-2015

After watching many decades of Stanford football I thought I'd never see a runner/receiver/returner as absolutely electrifying as Darrin Nelson... but now I have.  That he's as modest and self-effacing is a brobdingnagian credit to them both.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Rally - 12-06-2015

His immediate response to praise for the three ways he scored was to point out Hogan's accomplishment.  I can't remember where I read this, but apparently in one post-game interview or another he was told that his brother won their state title yesterday; he seemed more excited about that than his own accomplishment.  As a Soph he has left the Stanford and Pac12 record books in shambles.  The single season records may very well be eventually set so high by him they will seem out of reach, not to mention career records.  They will eventually be broken, of course, but maybe like Sanders' . . . Not for a very long time.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - winflop - 12-06-2015

(12-05-2015, 10:31 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:My words:

Even more deserving of Voldemort than Toby Gerhart.  It would be a travesty if McCaffrey doesn't win it.  The ONLY thing he didn't do this year is return a punt for a TD.  But the stats, versatility, durability, and value to his team is off the charts.

1. CMac
2. Derek Henry
3. Deshaun Watson

Give Henry the Doak Walker.  He is probably a better RB but not by a lot.  Watson isn't even in the top 10 in QBR, but he is the leader of an undefeated team.  McCaffrey is the hands-down best PLAYER in CFB this year.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - larkinforever - 12-06-2015

Thought it would be interesting to look at the stats - amazing seasons for both individuals...

Christian McCaffrey:
Rushing: 319 rushes, 1847 yards, 5.79 per rush
Receiving: 41 receptions, 540 yards, 13.17 per reception
Kick Returns: 36 kick returns, 1042 yards, 28.94 per kick return
Punt Returns: 14 punt returns, 67 yards, 4.79 per punt return
Total: 410 touches, 3496 yards, 8.53 per touch
[Source: cfbstats.com]

Barry Sanders:
Rushing: 344 rushes, 2628 yards, 7.64 per rush
Receiving: 19 receptions, 106 yards, 5.58 per reception
Kick Returns: 21 kick returns, 421 yards, 20.05 per kick return
Punt Returns: 10 punt returns, 94 yards, 9.40 per punt return
Total: 394 touches, 3249 yards, 8.25 per touch
[Source: sports-reference.com]

Sanders had an amazing bowl game, but his stats for that (12th) game are not included above.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - winflop - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 04:07 PM)larkinforever link Wrote:Thought it would be interesting to look at the stats - amazing seasons for both individuals...

Christian McCaffrey:
Rushing: 319 rushes, 1847 yards, 5.79 per rush
Receiving: 41 receptions, 540 yards, 13.17 per reception
Kick Returns: 36 kick returns, 1042 yards, 28.94 per kick return
Punt Returns: 14 punt returns, 67 yards, 4.79 per punt return
Total: 410 touches, 3496 yards, 8.53 per touch
[Source: cfbstats.com]

Barry Sanders:
Rushing: 344 rushes, 2628 yards, 7.64 per rush
Receiving: 19 receptions, 106 yards, 5.58 per reception
Kick Returns: 21 kick returns, 421 yards, 20.05 per kick return
Punt Returns: 10 punt returns, 94 yards, 9.40 per punt return
Total: 394 touches, 3249 yards, 8.25 per touch
[Source: sports-reference.com]

Sanders had an amazing bowl game, but his stats for that (12th) game are not included above.

Yeah he really is THAT good.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Rally - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 04:03 PM)winflop link Wrote:[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=13922.msg146015#msg146015 date=1449379905]
My words:

Even more deserving of Voldemort than Toby Gerhart.  It would be a travesty if McCaffrey doesn't win it.  The ONLY thing he didn't do this year is return a punt for a TD.  But the stats, versatility, durability, and value to his team is off the charts.

1. CMac
2. Derek Henry
3. Deshaun Watson

Give Henry the Doak Walker.  He is probably a better RB but not by a lot.  Watson isn't even in the top 10 in QBR, but he is the leader of an undefeated team.  McCaffrey is the hands-down best PLAYER in CFB this year.
[/quote]

Best running back . . . "But not by a lot" is putting it mildly.  Henry 5.9 ypc, McCaffrey 5.8 ypc.  To call Henry the best player assumes McCaffrey played patsies all year, which is what I read several rabid SECers write.  The only thing I haven't heard/read is the race card which was sparingly used against Toby.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Ratmandoo - 12-06-2015

I don't think this has been posted anywhere but the guys at Pro Football Focus has graded the running backs and CMac grades out better than Henry (and this was before this weekend).

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/11/30/college-is-derrick-henry-the-best-running-back-in-the-country/
Quote:Against FBS competition this year, Henry’s rushing grade of +23.9 is fifth, trailing McCaffrey, LSU’s Leonard Fournette, Utah’s Devontae Booker and Perkins. If only looking at games against Power-5 schools, Henry moves up to second, but still checks in behind McCaffrey’s comfortable lead.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/12/01/college-why-derrick-henry-shouldnt-win-the-Voldemort-trophy/
Quote:The best player in the nation, in my opinion, is another running back. Stanford’s do-it-all playmaker Christian McCaffrey has been exciting to watch all year. At +39.1 he’s our highest-graded player at the position, and his rushing grade of +28.0 only trails Fournette. What makes McCaffrey special is that he can hurt you in so many different ways. His receiving grade of +11.5 is the best at the position, and he’s forced 67 missed tackles when you combine his rushing and receiving. Topping it all off is his ability as a kick returner, where he once again leads the nation with a grade of +9.0. He’s racked up 3,035 all purpose yards this year and he now firmly has Barry Sanders’ record of 3,250 in his sights. The fact that you can even mention McCaffrey in there with Sanders tells you exactly what kind of season he’s having, and it’s a season worthy of winning the Voldemort.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/11/23/why-christian-mccaffrey-is-our-no-1-college-running-back/  - This is from before the Notre Dame Game

Quote:Without a devastating passing game to lean on, Stanford often rides McCaffrey as far as he can take them, and the Cardinal rely on him to close out games and control the ball on the ground. He plays like a guy who is significantly larger than he is, and while players like Leonard Fournette will be the ones that set the draft community drooling, Christian McCaffrey has had the better season and is the player currently atop PFF’s running back rankings.



Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - SUBuddha - 12-07-2015

From one of the Husky fans on another board I frequent (sole Stanford fan in the Pac12 thread)

Quote:Lol, that made me wonder... I added up all the plays, there were 134 ran between both teams. McCaffery was responsible for 472 yards, so he averaged over 3.5 yards per play. So, he really averages more yards per play, even when his team's on defense, than a lot of guys do when they're actually in the game.



Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - jr - 12-07-2015

I DVR'd the entire PAC12 Championship.  Following a Sunday day of rest, I have begun, this morning, playing the replay.  I will likely watch it repeatedly, rewinding and re-watching at will the oh-so-many-to-count plays and performances (...CMcC does come to mind) by the black and red. During this time, I expect to be continuously smiling to no one in particular, while my wife attempts to explain my howling to the dog.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - StanfordMatt - 12-07-2015

I agree that McCaffrey should win the Voldemort but I'm trying not to spend much time thinking about it because I know that he won't and it likely won't even be close. I'll add that McCaffrey's snub won't irk me nearly as much as Griffin's win over Luck in 2011. That was truly a travesty.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - dabigv13 - 12-07-2015

The announcement for the finalists will be tonight on ESPN apparently. I think we're hoping for more finalists, which would be an indication of a more divided landscape. I think CMAC is more likely to get 2nd place votes over Henry where regional voters put their guy first.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - stupac2 - 12-07-2015

(12-07-2015, 11:19 AM)dabigv link Wrote:The announcement for the finalists will be tonight on ESPN apparently. I think we're hoping for more finalists, which would be an indication of a more divided landscape. I think CMAC is more likely to get 2nd place votes over Henry where regional voters put their guy first.

I think this is right, it's probably a better sign for us if it ends up being McCaffrey, Henry, Cook, Watson, and Elliot than just Henry and McCaffrey.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Sea Loon - 12-07-2015

I think my favorite stat- and apologies if this has been posted somewhere- is that McCaffrey has more total APY than four football teams' entire offense for the year (Missouri, UCF, Boston College, Kent St.). That's really incredible.




Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Rally - 12-07-2015

(12-07-2015, 11:11 AM)StanfordMatt link Wrote:I agree that McCaffrey should win the Voldemort but I'm trying not to spend much time thinking about it because I know that he won't and it likely won't even be close. I'll add that McCaffrey's snub won't irk me nearly as much as Griffin's win over Luck in 2011. That was truly a travesty.

I would vote for Toby's snub being an even bigger travesty, but only by a little. 


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - yvonne - 12-07-2015

I remember Robert Smith on air saying that Toby didn't deserve it because his team was not top 10, despite his having much better stats. Then, for Luck two years later, somehow being a top team didn't matter. That's why I'm convinced McCaffrey doesn't have a chance.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - Rally - 12-07-2015

(12-07-2015, 12:14 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:I remember Robert Smith on air saying that Toby didn't deserve it because his team was not top 10, despite his having much better stats. Then, for Luck two years later, somehow being a top team didn't matter. That's why I'm convinced McCaffrey doesn't have a chance.

I remember that, and someone else saying the award should go to a black player.  His absurd rationale was that since white QBs win, running back winners should be black.  Of course, I am sure he found some other rationale to vote against Luck twice.  I heard someone on the radio this morning say he couldn't vote for McCaffrey because he hadn't seen him enough.  It doesn't matter.  There will always be one excuse or another.


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - French Rage - 12-07-2015

(12-07-2015, 12:20 PM)ferrari link Wrote:[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=13922.msg146558#msg146558 date=1449515680]
I remember Robert Smith on air saying that Toby didn't deserve it because his team was not top 10, despite his having much better stats. Then, for Luck two years later, somehow being a top team didn't matter. That's why I'm convinced McCaffrey doesn't have a chance.

I remember that, and someone else saying the award should go to a black player.  His absurd rationale was that since white QBs win, running back winners should be black.  Of course, I am sure he found some other rationale to vote against Luck twice.  I heard someone on the radio this morning say he couldn't vote for McCaffrey because he hadn't seen him enough.  It doesn't matter.  There will always be one excuse or another.
[/quote]

I'm also betting there's a feeling the Stanford players already have it so nice because they're rich and go to Stanford, so the award should go to someone from a less affluent school.  That'll teach our players' parents for being smart with their finances and raising intelligent children!


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - OutsiderFan - 12-07-2015

I think the West overwhelmingly is for CMac. Midwest is about even with CMac and Elliott.  CMac is second to Watson in Atlantic (voters want Watson so they vote CMac #2 and Henry #3)  and Henry wins in Southeast.

This is how CMac wins.




Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - jacketree - 12-07-2015

I hope Keenan Reynolds from Navy makes the finalist list, just so that he flies straight from the Army-Navy game to New York in a helicopter.  That would be be about as badass as his game helmet.  (More badass if he flew it himself, but he isn't qualified.)


California has one-eighth of the U.S. population, so CMac should win in a landslide. ;)


Re: I have no words for McCaffrey - stupac2 - 12-07-2015

(12-07-2015, 01:21 PM)jacketree link Wrote:I hope Keenan Reynolds from Navy makes the finalist list, just so that he flies straight from the Army-Navy game to New York in a helicopter.  That would be be about as badass as his game helmet.  (More badass if he flew it himself, but he isn't qualified.)


California has one-eighth of the U.S. population, so CMac should win in a landslide. ;)

Oh man, Reynolds flying himself in a chopper from the game to the ceremony, in full pads, would be literally the best thing ever.