It's already time for way-too-early rankings season

It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season (/thread-11327.html)

Pages: 1 2

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - BostonCard - 01-12-2016

Gee Kirk, love you some SEC?

Here are 7 teams to watch from NFL.com:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000621163/article/seven-early-top-college-football-playoff-contenders-for-2016

Oklahoma from the Big12
Alabama and LSU from the SEC
Clemson from the ACC
tOSU from the BigTen
Stanford from the Pac-12
Notre Dame

It seems like they just took the top ranked teams in the final poll and added Notre Dame, because, well, Notre Dame.

BC

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - washingtonismoney - 01-12-2016

Mandel: http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/cfb-top-25-2016-season-clemson-tigers-florida-state-seminoles-alabama-crimson-tide-011116

#12 Stanford
#15 UW
#16 ND
#17 SC
#22 Oregon
#24 (sort of) Utah

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - Mick - 01-12-2016

(01-12-2016, 12:25 AM)JJJ link Wrote:"Three Pac-12 titles in four years isn't a dynasty"-- huh??Â ???

That's like Colin Cowherd stating that he found the Warriors boring because they couldn't pass or play defense, and that the 10 foot jump shots the Bulls took in the early 1990s were more exciting than the 30 foot three pointers that the Warriors take.

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - BostonCard - 01-12-2016

https://twitter.com/lsju97/status/687072098427076608

Someone picks us for the playoffs.

BC

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - stupac2 - 01-12-2016

Charles Arbuckle? What a name!

And wouldn't it have been fun if that were the playoff this year? Oh well. Kind of funny to just pick the top 4 after this year for next year, it's almost certain someone will slip up along the way.

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - amartinsu13 - 01-12-2016

(01-12-2016, 06:12 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:https://twitter.com/lsju97/status/687072098427076608

Someone picks us for the playoffs.

BC

lmao @ picking the playoffs 230 days before the season begins...

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - CowboyIndian - 01-12-2016

(01-12-2016, 11:49 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:https://twitter.com/KirkHerbstreit/status/686980496413356032

Really? 3 $EC teams in the top 5? I like the fact he included us but otherwise I think I'm going to be ill.

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - JJJ - 01-13-2016

(01-12-2016, 04:07 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=JJJ link=topic=14330.msg152389#msg152389 date=1452583545]
"Three Pac-12 titles in four years isn't a dynasty"-- huh??Â ???

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - CTcard - 01-13-2016

I think that Mr. Arbuckle is just confused and putting in his ballot for the 2015-16 playoffs five weeks too late.

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - TrumpCard - 01-13-2016

If you believe Twitter rumors, then 3/5 might be right. Talk that Shuler is leaving. That's as bad as Wayne Lyons last year.Â He's entitled to leave if he wants, of course, but that wouldn't reduce the sting.

Re: It's already time for way-too-early rankings season - BostonCard - 01-25-2016

http://www.pacifictakes.com/2016/1/25/10828266/way-too-early-2016-pacific-takes-pac-12-power-rankings

Sadly someone picked us for the top of their 2016 Power Rankings.Â That's the kiss of death.

BC