Ryan Burns it is - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ryan Burns it is (/thread-12452.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ryan Burns it is (/thread-12452.html)
Re: Ryan Burns it is - yvonne - 08-24-2016
(08-24-2016, 04:27 PM)French Rage link Wrote:As someone who make a lot of signs for games, I like this.
The name "Burns" works better. To be topical, I can do a "Feel the Burns" one. Or perhaps to appeal to the younger crowd, there can be a Mr. Burns reference. Or anything using "burn" as a verb.
There's really only one word "Chryst" is similar too, and I ain't going there with a funny sign. Even in the Bay Area, that's asking for it.
:P
Oh, for Chryst's sake. ::)
Re: Ryan Burns it is - JohnR34231 - 08-25-2016
(08-24-2016, 06:18 PM)CTcard link Wrote:I was expecting this, just wasn't expecting this yet.
I thought comments from Shaw and Bloomgren had a hint of Burns playing better than Chryst lately (though if you press me I cannot back that up) and also thought that based upon the little bit that was available to be seen publicly Burns was on a better trajectory (behind last fall, even last spring, looking somewhat better this fall).
It will be interesting to see how much time Chryst actually gets. It seems to me that in the past Shaw had intentions of playing a backup of QB at least a moderate amount but in the heat of a game that rarely happened. I am sure he both wants Chryst to be ready if necessary and thinks it was a close enough competition that Chryst "deserves" some time - but it will still be hard to pull the trigger.
I'm also sure the motivation for Shaw is partially to keep Chryst engaged and around. But as to what Chryst does now, I guess that is the question for each and every QB who loses a competition to be the starter. The answer is as individual as the people.
ADD:
If it is any source of optimism, Ryan Burns' career pass efficiency rating is 209.2*.
This compares favorably to Hogan's career average rating of 154.5 or Luck's 162.8, and even Chryst's 147.3. Of course it doesn't approach McCaffrey's career 395.9 - don't know why he didn't get named QB starter.
* Burns acquired that rating on 1 completion in 1 attempt for 13 yards, 0 TDs, and 0 INTs.
Now that Shaw has decided on Burns as the starter I would think he would want to give him as much playing time as possible before he has to face U$C and the rest. So assuming he plays reasonably well against KSU, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of Chryst.
Who knows, though.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - OutsiderFan - 08-25-2016
When I attend a practice in March, I just assumed Chryst would be the guy because he was #2 last season. But Burns was just as impressive as Chryst, to my surprise. Chryst is no slug for sure, but Burns is a slightly better runner. If Chryst doesn't have a better grasp of the offense, doesn't show appreciably better decision-making, and isn't demonstrating greater accuracy on his throws, Burns would be the choice. Given this, it's disappointing Chryst didn't win the job. If he did, it would tell me he has greater accuracy and decision-making ability. My confidence in the QB position just took a hit until Burns wins me over, because if Chryst isn't that accurate and it took this long for Burns to be named starter, he probably isn't all that accurate himself. We'll see soon enough.
As for what Chryst does, who knows, but he's in the same class as Max Browne, who hasn't exactly lived up to his hype either.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - washingtonismoney - 08-25-2016
(08-24-2016, 10:14 PM)Phogge link Wrote:For what it's worth Fborg and I have always thought that Burns throws a beautiful ball. Going to be interesting when the Second Coming shows up in Palo Alto next summer. If Burns is The Guy expect either Chryst or Costello to transfer, perhaps both.
It'd surprise me if Costello transferred -- from his perspective Burns is the ideal winner of the contest. (I assume he didn't expect to win the contest as a true freshman.) But what the heck do I know?
Re: Ryan Burns it is - JohnR34231 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 05:32 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=Phogge link=topic=15484.msg168394#msg168394 date=1472102080]
For what it's worth Fborg and I have always thought that Burns throws a beautiful ball. Going to be interesting when the Second Coming shows up in Palo Alto next summer. If Burns is The Guy expect either Chryst or Costello to transfer, perhaps both.
It'd surprise me if Costello transferred -- from his perspective Burns is the ideal winner of the contest. (I assume he didn't expect to win the contest as a true freshman.) But what the heck do I know?
[/quote]
Yeah, it would seem that redshirting a year, backing up Burns for a year, playing two years, getting his degree, and then heading off to the NFL would be an excellent scenario for Costello. He'll have to beat out Mills to do it, though.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - CTcard - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 05:32 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=Phogge link=topic=15484.msg168394#msg168394 date=1472102080]
For what it's worth Fborg and I have always thought that Burns throws a beautiful ball. Going to be interesting when the Second Coming shows up in Palo Alto next summer. If Burns is The Guy expect either Chryst or Costello to transfer, perhaps both.
It'd surprise me if Costello transferred -- from his perspective Burns is the ideal winner of the contest. (I assume he didn't expect to win the contest as a true freshman.) But what the heck do I know?
[/quote]
Yeah, if Costello transfers because Burns won this competition it would be ... strange.
There used to be a lot of complaining about Shaw not recruiting hard at QB every year. Now we're about to see the complications of Shaw recruiting very well at QB for several years in a row.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - DenverCard - 08-25-2016
Isn't Chryst's uncle the head coach at University of Wisconsin? I hate to see anyone leave Stanford for any reason, an there are no guarantees that Burns will be the answer for the next couple of years, but Wisconsin might be a school that Chryst would be strongly considering now.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - FarmBoy - 08-25-2016
How many blue chip recruits have careers that don't amount to much because they lose out on the QB competition? These guys know the game when they sign up with a top school that has a strong talent pipeline. But it has to be a hard pill to swallow.
Or is it the standard these days that a blue chip QB will transfer if it looks like their chances of having a college career are minimal?
Re: Ryan Burns it is - stanfan - 08-25-2016
No mention of Davis Mills? Isn't he our first ever 5 star QB commit? Lots of talent will be competing for one spot over the next few years. Nice problem to have.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - JohnR34231 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 07:23 AM)stanfan link Wrote:No mention of Davis Mills? Isn't he our first ever 5 star QB commit? Lots of talent will be competing for one spot over the next few years. Nice problem to have.
I mentioned him above as someone who KJ is ultimately going to have to beat out if he wants to be the starter.
Andrew Luck had 5 stars, although he didn't get his fifth until fairly late in his senior year, IIRC.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - needle - 08-25-2016
Hey, people who pay attention to recruiting in the fall (unlike me): Davis Mills has not signed any letter of intent.
How many top 100 recruits have ended up switching their commitments before signing day? A not insignificant number.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - FarmBoy - 08-25-2016
Recruits can't sign an LOI until Jan/Feb, right? All the commitments now are just verbal and can be tossed aside on a whim.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - stupac2 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 04:26 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Now that Shaw has decided on Burns as the starter I would think he would want to give him as much playing time as possible before he has to face U$C and the rest. So assuming he plays reasonably well against KSU, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of Chryst.
Who knows, though.
Especially because Shaw has a weird habit of saying that the #2 guy is going to get experience and then not doing it. I pointed this out upthread, but all last year he was saying that they needed to get Burns/Chryst into games and get real experience, and then just flat-out did not do that (they probably could've played 5X as many snaps as they did without costing us any chance at winning). So if Burns starts, I'd expect to see him in there for 90% of the snaps, even if we're winning handily.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - Trevmiesterj - 08-25-2016
If I was to hazard a guess as to one reason that may have pushed Ryan ahead of Keller, I would point to Burn's better running ability. I was surprised as to how much Hogan ran over the last 3 seasons (averaging 80-90 plays) once I checked the stats.Â
Bloomgren and Shaw most certainly enjoy having that arrow in the quiver. That option should be even more explosive with the defense keying on McCaff.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - Phogge - 08-25-2016
Mills has been anointed by the services which in itself is only an indication of his prowess. Those who have seen him at the summer camps rave about him. His injury puts him back a bit but I remember the agony of watching Luck in 2009 and the thought that no way he stays for the fifth year and why didn't Harballs play him in '08. So if Mills is that good somebody will transfer or perhaps West goes somewhere else. Or we could all die in the future Ebola outbreak and then it doesn't matter.Â
Re: Ryan Burns it is - Mick - 08-25-2016
(08-24-2016, 10:14 PM)Phogge link Wrote:For what it's worth Fborg and I have always thought that Burns throws a beautiful ball. Going to be interesting when the Second Coming shows up in Palo Alto next summer. If Burns is The Guy expect either Chryst or Costello to transfer, perhaps both.
I don't see Chryst or Costello transferring. Costello too young, Chryst a dedicated local and has a year more of eligibility.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - JohnR34231 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 08:21 AM)FarmBoy link Wrote:Recruits can't sign an LOI until Jan/Feb, right? All the commitments now are just verbal and can be tossed aside on a whim.
True, but I don't expect Mills to change his mind because
 1) He has been admitted. It is fairly rare for a Stanford commit to change his mind after he has been admitted. Can anyone think of anybody (fairly recently) besides Zumwalt?
 2) He now has a knee injury which will cause him to miss most if not all of his senior season. This will in all probability cause him to think about life after football (favoring Stanford) and keep other teams from pursuing him too vigorously.
Re: Ryan Burns it is - Mick - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 04:47 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:When I attend a practice in March, I just assumed Chryst would be the guy because he was #2 last season. But Burns was just as impressive as Chryst, to my surprise. Chryst is no slug for sure, but Burns is a slightly better runner. If Chryst doesn't have a better grasp of the offense, doesn't show appreciably better decision-making, and isn't demonstrating greater accuracy on his throws, Burns would be the choice. Given this, it's disappointing Chryst didn't win the job. If he did, it would tell me he has greater accuracy and decision-making ability. My confidence in the QB position just took a hit until Burns wins me over, because if Chryst isn't that accurate and it took this long for Burns to be named starter, he probably isn't all that accurate himself. We'll see soon enough.
As for what Chryst does, who knows, but he's in the same class as Max Browne, who hasn't exactly lived up to his hype either.
I've talked to a fair number of coaches who've expressed the opinion that if two candidates for a prominent position are comparatively equal in ability -- catcher, setter, quarterback -- then they tend to go with the younger option, on the theory that there's a greater upside. I wonder what's the case here...
Re: Ryan Burns it is - stupac2 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 08:47 AM)Phogge link Wrote:Mills has been anointed by the services which in itself is only an indication of his prowess. Those who have seen him at the summer camps rave about him. His injury puts him back a bit but I remember the agony of watching Luck in 2009 and the thought that no way he stays for the fifth year and why didn't Harballs play him in '08. So if Mills is that good somebody will transfer or perhaps West goes somewhere else. Or we could all die in the future Ebola outbreak and then it doesn't matter.
Who is West? I thought Costello was the pick for '16 and Mills is '17, is West '18?
Re: Ryan Burns it is - JohnR34231 - 08-25-2016
(08-25-2016, 08:52 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=Phogge link=topic=15484.msg168429#msg168429 date=1472140026]
Mills has been anointed by the services which in itself is only an indication of his prowess. Those who have seen him at the summer camps rave about him. His injury puts him back a bit but I remember the agony of watching Luck in 2009 and the thought that no way he stays for the fifth year and why didn't Harballs play him in '08. So if Mills is that good somebody will transfer or perhaps West goes somewhere else. Or we could all die in the future Ebola outbreak and then it doesn't matter.
Who is West? I thought Costello was the pick for '16 and Mills is '17, is West '18?
[/quote]
Yep, West is '18.