Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
Phogge - 09-19-2016
Pop warner 47 Red Sanders 17.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
HisWildness - 09-20-2016
Stanford 34
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
Bruce Wang - 09-20-2016
"There she stood in the street." Paul Rodgers - 27
"Asian girls everywhere, UCLA." Childish Gambino - 23
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
standfan - 09-20-2016
Stanford 34
UCLA 20
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
murky - 09-20-2016
34-13 Stanford
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
yvonne - 09-20-2016
(09-20-2016, 06:09 AM)HisWildness link Wrote:Stanford 34
UCLAÂ 17
Love gets his first touchdown run of the year
D gets a pick 6
Welcome, HW
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
TRD - 09-20-2016
I don't care what the score as long as Stanford has more points than UKLA when the final play is over!!
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
martyup - 09-20-2016
Shouldn't we have home field advantage? After all, the game is in the Rose Bowl. ::)
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
CPSteeple - 09-20-2016
The Tree 24
Joe and Josie Bruin 14
Shaw and the coaching staff always have the boys ready for UCLA, and I don't see this time being any different.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
MSmith23 - 09-20-2016
Stanford 27
UCLA 24
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
winflop - 09-20-2016
Thought I had posted in this thread earlier but apparently not
Trees 34
Josephines 19
UCLA will move the ball between the 20s but will struggle in the RZ, resulting in a lot of FGs. The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense. Another day with 300 yards on the ground but 200 passing to go with it this time - Burns will not miss over the top twice like he did on Saturday.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
CTcard - 09-20-2016
(09-20-2016, 01:28 PM)winflop link Wrote:The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
needle - 09-20-2016
If Mora was a better coach...but he's not.
Stanford - 30
UCLA - 27
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
Sonof80sCard - 09-20-2016
Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
Mick - 09-20-2016
(09-20-2016, 05:23 PM)Sonof80sCard link Wrote:Stanford 31
Ruins 20.
In a different year they might be favored but I don't think UCLA has the offense to keep up.
Been a while since it's been a "different year..."
2015/10/15 UCLA   35 - Stanford 56 L              Â
2014/11/28 UCLA   10 - Stanford 31 L              Â
2013/10/19 UCLA   10 - Stanford 24 L              Â
2012/11/30 UCLA   24 - Stanford 27 L  ** PAC 12 CHAMPIONSHIP **
2012/11/24 UCLA   17 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2011/10/01 UCLA   19 - Stanford 45 L              Â
2010/09/11 UCLA    0 - Stanford 35 L              Â
2009/10/03 UCLA   16 - Stanford 24 LÂ
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
TreesAndBirds - 09-20-2016
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl on New Years Day.        27
Team that plays in the Rose Bowl during the regular season.  17
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
Sea Loon - 09-20-2016
Stanford 28
UCLA 26
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
fullmetal - 09-20-2016
Tunnel Worker Dudes 37
Wahhh-doods 20
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
winflop - 09-20-2016
(09-20-2016, 01:48 PM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=winflop link=topic=15712.msg172088#msg172088 date=1474403333]
The TWU will continue to improve against an undermanned and inexperienced UCLA defense.
Why would you call UCLA's defense undermanned and inexperienced?
I believe they have something like 10 returning starters - though Vanderdoes is returning from two years ago. And their two-deep seems to be mostly juniors and seniors.
So far, they have played at least pretty well.
[/quote]
I thought they lost their best player from last year's team at each layer (DL, LB, DB) if not more than one? That was my basis for thinking that but maybe that wasn't correct.
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions -
HisKneeWasDown - 09-20-2016
(09-19-2016, 08:21 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:I'll go with 50% of last year's score.
Stanford 28
Other guys 17
hahahahaha good call.