Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread (/thread-12707.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread (/thread-12707.html)
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - jacketree - 09-24-2016
Zero pressure on Rosen that drive. Looked pretty easy.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Yup, the Domers lose. To 1-2 Duke. At home.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Langdude - 09-24-2016
Good protection by UCLA, good presence and throw by Rosen.
-m.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - washingtonismoney - 09-24-2016
Disadvantage to slow tempo: stuff like picks hurts you more proportionally.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - rudruff - 09-24-2016
Not sure how I feel about this playing from behind stuff.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - jacketree - 09-24-2016
Well, harder to turtleð
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Chryst in.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Wow, that was an amazing cut by McCaffrey.
C
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - HisKneeWasDown - 09-24-2016
Of course too early to panic, but that turnover and UCLA drive did not look good.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Deepwater Horizon the movie? WTF?
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Stymie - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 05:48 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Wow, that was an amazing cut by McCaffrey.
C
CMac should have steamrollered the Ref.
BTW my previous post should have not questioned Ryan's brain, but his "footballing brain."Â Two very different things.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Illegal substitution on a third and five. Ouch.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016
Damn, that needs to be caught. Would have been a first down.
BC
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - JJJ - 09-24-2016
I'm watching on my phone on WatchESPN and I'm behind by at least 1 play... ???
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - CrazedZooChimp - 09-24-2016
I'm so happy with how good Bailey has been at punts this year. Let's see if UCLA can drive 95 yards, a lot harder than 25.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - needle - 09-24-2016
Give Chryst another series.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - murky - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 05:55 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Damn, that needs to be caught. Would have been a first down.
BC
Looked like he got a helmet to the chin on that hit. Maybe not the first contact, but the follow through. You could see him trying to clear his head after.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Stymie - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 05:55 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Damn, that needs to be caught. Would have been a first down.
BC
The safety head-butted the football just after Schultz touched it. Even Jerry Rice could not have caught that ball. Great play by #21.
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - thunder_chik - 09-24-2016
Is it too late to change my score prediction? :-X
Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - HisKneeWasDown - 09-24-2016
(09-24-2016, 05:58 PM)murky link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=15750.msg172589#msg172589 date=1474764958]
Damn, that needs to be caught. Would have been a first down.
BC
Looked like he got a helmet to the chin on that hit. Maybe not the first contact, but the follow through. You could see him trying to clear his head after.
[/quote]
Schultz normally sure-handed. Still too early to panic. ???