Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
North Woods - 11-13-2017
(11-13-2017, 10:33 AM)French Rage link Wrote:Looking some more, Warner was only 5-1-3. Ralston was 7-2-0 and Willingham was 7-0-0, so with Shaw currently setting at 6-0-0 he could tie the record this week.
Also he was 3-1 as a player and 2-2 as an assistant, so he's been a part of 11 wins -- not counting his time when he was merely Willie Shaw's son.
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
North Woods - 11-13-2017
(11-13-2017, 10:33 AM)French Rage link Wrote:Looking some more, Warner was only 5-1-3. Ralston was 7-2-0 and Willingham was 7-0-0, so with Shaw currently setting at 6-0-0 he could tie the record this week.
Also he was 3-1 as a player and 2-2 as an assistant, so he's been a part of 11 wins -- not counting his time when he was merely Willie Shaw's son.
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
Duck Tears - 11-13-2017
A Stanford win would break the record for the longest streak of consecutive Big Game wins.
Stanford has twice (1995-2001 / 2010-current) won seven straight.
Cal's longest win streak over Stanford is five (1919-1923 / 2002-2006). The Bears went 6-0-2 between 1947-1954).
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
yvonne - 11-13-2017
Yeah, I phrased it pretty poorly. Here's what will happen with a Big Game win:
- Shaw will set the all time record for wins by a Stanford head coach (currently tied with Pop Warner)
- Shaw will tie Willingham as coaches with the most Big Game wins
- Stanford will have the longest streak of Big Game wins
I just think it's fitting that
Cal is the team he will have the opportunity to break the overall record against.
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
French Rage - 11-13-2017
(11-13-2017, 02:06 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:I just think it's fitting that ×ÉÉ is the team he will have the opportunity to break the overall record against.
It certainly makes it all the cooler. This is a big Big Game. A Bigger Game, if you will.
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
jacketree - 11-13-2017
(11-12-2017, 09:57 PM)81alum link Wrote:How fitting. Back in 77 and 78 when I was in awe of Walsh I, I heard stories about Pop Warner and thought "no one can ever pass him....the modern era and our elite academic status just won't permit it."
I was wrong. Shaw has figured out a way.
That's the interesting and impressive thing. Getting to 72 wins at a school shouldn't be that hard. Average seven wins a year over ten years. But would any coach that averages seven wins a year last ten years anymore, and at Stanford would any coach that
averages ten plus wins a year as Shaw has, stay as long as he has? As others have said in the thread, Shaw staying when so successful is the biggest thing.
Re: I knew this, but I didn't *realize* it until now -
terry - 11-13-2017
Shaw and Pop Warner have very similar records:
................Record...... Pct. ....Seasons...Conf. Championships
Shaw........71-20...... .780......... 6+ ............ 3
Warner.....71-17-8... .781......... 9............... 3