St. Brown brothers - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: St. Brown brothers (/thread-15367.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: St. Brown brothers (/thread-15367.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: St. Brown brothers - fullmetal - 01-07-2018
<salty> I'm surprised if any 5-star WR with early NFL aspirations would want to sign with Stanford right now given the lack of WR showcase in the offense and QB troubles. </salty>
Re: St. Brown brothers - SF_Cardinal_Fan - 01-07-2018
(01-07-2018, 01:19 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:<salty> I'm surprised if any 5-star WR with early NFL aspirations would want to sign with Stanford right now given the lack of WR showcase in the offense and QB troubles. </salty>
What do you mean by "QB troubles"?
Re: St. Brown brothers - CowboyIndian - 01-07-2018
(01-07-2018, 10:49 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:... its about what the guys who you do wind up doing.
Thats what she said.
Re: St. Brown brothers - lex24 - 01-07-2018
Read an article with a bunch of his quotes. Suffice it to say I was not impressed. Dont misunderstand me, Im not suggesting thats a reason not to offer. Dont want to go there.Â
(01-06-2018, 10:05 PM)JPRI link Wrote:IMO, the primary factors were:
1. He wanted to play with his HS QB, whom he knows will get him the ball. For those who can remember back to the 70's, think Pat Haden and JK McKay.
2, He wants to get to the NFL as soon as possible. This is more important to him than the "40 year decision".
3. His personality is more suited to U$C. Anyone catch his on the field antics during the Army AA game, which drew him an Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty?
Unfortunately for us, the guy can play. Not looking forward to having to face him for three years.
Re: St. Brown brothers - BostonCard - 01-07-2018
(01-07-2018, 10:58 AM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=18499.msg220512#msg220512 date=1515347342]
Its not a good look to disparage guys who we offered and who chose to go elsewhere. Good luck to Amon-Ra. Unfortunately, I think he is the mos talented of the three and could have helped us.
But, as they say, its not about the guys who you dont land; its about what the guys who you do wind up doing.
BC
Well, we had threads and threads of posts disparaging Josh Rosen and no one seemed to get too excited. Was that OK because we chose not to offer him?
Not saying ASB is a bad apple, he just appears to be a bit of a showboat.
[/quote]
We didnt offer Rosen. Also, I think underlying the debates about Rosen was really a debate about the coach who chose not to offer him. I doubt that three years after the fact, we would have had threads about it had he been offered and still decided to go to UCLA.
BC
Re: St. Brown brothers - Mick - 01-07-2018
(01-07-2018, 02:26 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18499.msg220513#msg220513 date=1515347898]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=18499.msg220512#msg220512 date=1515347342]
Its not a good look to disparage guys who we offered and who chose to go elsewhere. Good luck to Amon-Ra. Unfortunately, I think he is the mos talented of the three and could have helped us.
But, as they say, its not about the guys who you dont land; its about what the guys who you do wind up doing.
BC
Well, we had threads and threads of posts disparaging Josh Rosen and no one seemed to get too excited. Was that OK because we chose not to offer him?
Not saying ASB is a bad apple, he just appears to be a bit of a showboat.
[/quote]
We didnt offer Rosen. Also, I think underlying the debates about Rosen was really a debate about the coach who chose not to offer him. I doubt that three years after the fact, we would have had threads about it had he been offered and still decided to go to UCLA.
BC
[/quote]
Rosen wasn't a showboat. That's not why we didn't offer him. At the beginning of Rosen's senior year, I read an interview in which Rosen revealed an awful lot of his personality, and it didn't conform to what I imagine Shaw would expect from any of his players, and in particular his quarterback. Three months later, I went back to find the interview, and couldn't find it. But given Mora's exasperated actions and reactions, I think we probably made the right choice.
Re: St. Brown brothers - JohnR34231 - 01-08-2018
(01-07-2018, 02:26 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=18499.msg220513#msg220513 date=1515347898]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=18499.msg220512#msg220512 date=1515347342]
Its not a good look to disparage guys who we offered and who chose to go elsewhere. Good luck to Amon-Ra. Unfortunately, I think he is the mos talented of the three and could have helped us.
But, as they say, its not about the guys who you dont land; its about what the guys who you do wind up doing.
BC
Well, we had threads and threads of posts disparaging Josh Rosen and no one seemed to get too excited. Was that OK because we chose not to offer him?
Not saying ASB is a bad apple, he just appears to be a bit of a showboat.
[/quote]
We didnt offer Rosen. Also, I think underlying the debates about Rosen was really a debate about the coach who chose not to offer him. I doubt that three years after the fact, we would have had threads about it had he been offered and still decided to go to UCLA.
BC
[/quote]
Well, I'll conclude my remarks on this issue by saying I don't find whether we offered a guy or not a particularly compelling rule as to whether we are allowed to make "disparaging" comments about him.
Re: St. Brown brothers - BostonCard - 01-08-2018
You have a good point. However, I would say that it would be challenging to have a frank discussion about why we didn't offer a player without saying something disparaging about the player, unless you want to take Shaw's point that we didn't take any QB's that year at face value (no, we didn't take any QB's, but we did offer one), or without being vague to the point of unhelpfulness("we didn't offer because we decided to go in a different direction"). Third, of course, as I pointed out, the discussion about Rosen was less a discussion about Rosen than it was a discussion about Shaw.
And lastly, other than the admin, there is no rule about making disparaging comments. I just pointed out that it's not a good look; it comes across as sour grapes. But if you feel strongly about the issue, you have every right to post your thoughts.
BC
Re: St. Brown brothers - Hank 91 - 01-08-2018
(01-06-2018, 06:38 PM)JJJ link Wrote:[quote author=gocard14 link=topic=18499.msg220484#msg220484 date=1515287155]Don't have any personal insight, but it seemed like every article I read about them made it seem like each brother wanted to blaze his own trail.
You also have to figure that hes a 17 year old with 2 prominent older brothers. Some want to follow in their brothers footsteps. Others will want to make their own path. Both are totally normal.
[/quote]
This was the feeling I always had, probably from reading the same articles. This appears to be a unique family, and I'm really looking forward to getting to see (and learn more about) Osiris in the fall. It would've been great to have Amon-Ra, as people seem to believe he's the most talented of the three brothers, but one will have to be enough.