Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019

Finally a TFL

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019

Buffs punt.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019

We force Colorado to punt, and then we muff the punt.  Just friggin great.

BC

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019

Well, that is a break.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019

Bailed out by the penalty.

BC

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019

I was about to post before the muff, but McGill has been a revelation this year.
The frosh in the secondary Kelly and McGill have been really solid.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019

Fortune smiles on the Cardinal right there.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019

Dodged a bullet.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019

For a big guy, Parkinson plays small.

BC

---

lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019

Great routes. Everyone within 3 yards. Squeeze that field. What an awful set of downs.

---

Yes, he does. I’d like to see more Fisk. 

(11-09-2019, 01:42 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  For a big guy, Parkinson plays small.

BC

---

Very gentle defense. Whens the last time you actually remember a Stanford defender hitting somebody. Where are the old days when you had guys like Henry Anderson Gardiner, Murphy, Skov Chase Thomas. Theyd absolutely pulverize somebody every once in a while. This defense they don’t hit. Not at all it’s so freaking soft

---

RE: lex24 - d4cohn - 11-09-2019

(11-09-2019, 01:42 PM)lex24 Wrote:  Great routes. Everyone within 3 yards. Squeeze that field. What an awful set of downs.

---

Yes, he does. I’d like to see more Fisk. 

(11-09-2019, 01:42 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  For a big guy, Parkinson plays small.

BC

It still would have worked if Costello had looked past his first progression. Fehoko was wide open
on the right side of the formation for a first down. Never looked his direction.

---

lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019

What a crappy quarter

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Brickcity - 11-09-2019

What's the word that comes to mind watching this team? Could it be, "mediocre"?

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019

Great technique from Mike Williams.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - JJJ - 11-09-2019

Party in the backfield!

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019

The days of big hitters is gone.  The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that.  If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half.  Not worth it.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019

Three man rush, and a receiver wide open in the middle of the field.  WTF?

BC

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - needle - 11-09-2019

Quote: I don't think we will have issues

keeping up in terms of scoring.

I wish. Stanford will struggle to score 20.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019

Well, Parson made up for his fellow safety on the last play. Good to see him have a moment, since
it has been an up-and-down year for him.

---

RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019

But great defense on the slant for the INT!

Talk about a Jekyll and Hyde defense.

BC

---