Stanford working on the running game for Duke - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford working on the running game for Duke (/thread-1914.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford working on the running game for Duke (/thread-1914.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Stanford working on the running game for Duke - mark3k - 10-24-2011
Honestly, Yvonne... this would have been a bowl team even with a poor running game! Remember, 6-6 almost certainly makes a bowl (with a Voldemort candidate QB), and we've won 7 (by more than 25 points each), with 5 still to go, and have barely let Andrew get warmed up! Don't get me wrong... I love our running game, but was there really any question if we'd go to a bowl this year?
Re: Stanford working on the running game for Duke - yvonne - 10-24-2011
That's what I said. Let me fix the code above the quote so you can see it better. In short, bowl team w/out running game BCS level bowl team with.
Re: Stanford working on the running game for Duke - yvonne - 10-24-2011
There, it's amazing what a closed bracket will do for clarity!
Re: Stanford working on the running game for Duke - mark3k - 10-24-2011
Got ya... love that we're even able to talk about a team that would be bowl-bound, even if it's most recent source of awesomeness was far from awesome!
I guess I'm still just more confident in our other strengths than your "probably" and "mediocre" qualifiers implied (as per my "this would have been a bowl team even with a poor running game").