Oregon St. Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Oregon St. Game Thread (/thread-21156.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Oregon St. Game Thread (/thread-21156.html)
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Langdude - 12-12-2020
Have to give credit to safety McGill there...
-m.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Phogge - 12-12-2020
Lance, if you can’t get a push from your front you have to blitz. Finally they blitz and the Qb throws it away.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - martyup - 12-12-2020
Our D needs Mason.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 12-12-2020
Into the Victory position at the end of the 1st Half... after throwing a TD to Fehoko (called back on obvious holding).
Turtle it, down 9 to 14 after 30min.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Red80 - 12-12-2020
(12-12-2020, 09:31 PM)martyup Wrote: Our D needs Mason.
The defense needs players. A number of these guys look like mid-major caliber.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Phogge - 12-12-2020
No, the D needs talent first and speed also first. They have little of either. On the faux TD the guy Dalman is holding probably sacks Mills.
Since Stanford is not playing for the title why not get a little aggressive on defense. I hate passive play. Shaw will never fire Anderson.
BTW, Slovis did it again. Dynamic.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 12-12-2020
(12-12-2020, 09:41 PM)Phogge Wrote: No, the D needs talent first and speed also first. They have little of either. On the faux TD the guy Dalman is holding probably sacks Mills.
Since Stanford is not playing for the title why not get a little aggressive on defense. I hate passive play. Shaw will never fire Anderson.
BTW, Slovis did it again. Dynamic.
Slovis is incredible, poised -- looks like Joe Montana.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Phogge - 12-12-2020
And Florida goes down to a left hand true frosh QB who is really good.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Red80 - 12-12-2020
(12-12-2020, 09:41 PM)Phogge Wrote: No, the D needs talent first and speed also first. They have little of either. On the faux TD the guy Dalman is holding probably sacks Mills.
Since Stanford is not playing for the title why not get a little aggressive on defense. I hate passive play. Shaw will never fire Anderson.
BTW, Slovis did it again. Dynamic.
Perhaps fire him as Recruiting Coordinator? Doesn't he have that position? Anderson has had some good defenses...when he had better players.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Leftcoast - 12-12-2020
Is this on internet radio anywhere? Sure isn’t on KZSU.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - BostonCard - 12-12-2020
In other news, JT Daniels has been the difference this year in Georgia.
BC
A little razzle dazzle! Nice throw by Mills and catch by Fehoko, but worth noting that Fehoko was double covered.
BC
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - BobK - 12-12-2020
Great catch great play crap a review
Ok at the one
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - BostonCard - 12-12-2020
TD Mills on the keeper.
BC
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - martyup - 12-12-2020
Why not go for 2 on the extra point? If it fails, were up by 1. Now were up by 2.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - JohnR34231 - 12-12-2020
Great catch by Fehoko. What's the logic in not going for two?
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Brickcity - 12-12-2020
(12-12-2020, 10:06 PM)martyup Wrote: Why not go for 2 on the extra point? If it fails, were up by 1. Now were up by 2.
I was asking myself the same thing! Don't tell me this was another brain fart by our offensive (and I mean "offensive") brain trust.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - JJJ - 12-12-2020
Why do they insist on saying Fehoku when it’s spelled Fehoko? Am I wrong?
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - JohnR34231 - 12-12-2020
(12-12-2020, 10:08 PM)Brickcity Wrote:(12-12-2020, 10:06 PM)martyup Wrote: Why not go for 2 on the extra point? If it fails, were up by 1. Now were up by 2.
I was asking myself the same thing! Don't tell me this was another brain fart by our offensive (and I mean "offensive") brain trust.
The only thing I can think of is that if you get another TD it is now a two score game. If you go for two and miss it isn't.
Whoa, it didn't take the Beavers long to answer that one. I hope we can keep scoring. Looks like we are going to need to.
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - BostonCard - 12-12-2020
Early in the second half, you have no idea what the next sequence of scores is going to be, and you may wind up regretting not having that point. For example, now that Oregon State scored to go up by 5, if we get two field goals we would win.
BC
RE: Oregon St. Game Thread - Red80 - 12-12-2020
I don't normally nitpick play-calling, but Stanford is 0-4 on that slant pattern to Humphreys. None of them have been close.