The CardBoard
Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College (/thread-25747.html)

Pages: 1 2

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - Papa John - 09-16-2025

Per SuperWest Sports on X:

PFF QB Grades thru Week 3 (D1 players from the Rockies states to Hawaii)

91.4—Colandrea, UNLV
87.0—Sagapolutele, Cal
83.8—Fifita, Arizona
83.7—Williams Jr., Washington
83.5—Moore, Oregon
81.4—Maiava, USC
77.1—Dampier, Utah
76.5—Iamaleava, UCLA
76.4—Barnes, Utah St
74.5—Murphy, Ore St
73.8—Madsen, Boise St
71.7—Layne, New Mexico
71.1—Bachmeier, BYU
70.3—Leavitt, ASU
70.2—Warner, Fresno St
69.3—Denegal, SDSU
66.7—Potter, WSU
66.5—Szarka, Air Force
63.7—Purdy, Nevada
61.4—Anderson, Wyoming
61.2—Eget, SJSU
57.0—Fowler-Nicolosi, CSU
53.5—Weaver, Hawai'i
37.4—Gulbranson, Stanford
35.3—Staub, Colorado

NB: I don't know if these cumulative rankings are simple averages of week-by-week ratings, but if they are Gulbranson would have rated at 53.2 for week 3. Still not great but obviously a step up from his 29.5 ratings for weeks 0 and 2.

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - fullmetal - 09-16-2025

I saw his QBR at 55.4 somewhere, but what's a couple of points among fans...(yes, those rankings have to be cumulative/average)

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - Mick - 09-16-2025

(09-16-2025, 10:25 AM)fullmetal Wrote:  I saw his QBR at 55.4 somewhere, but what's a couple of points among fans...(yes, those rankings have to be cumulative/average)

You saw that on ESPN
Ben Gulbranson - Stanford Cardinal Quarterback - ESPN

His overall passer rating (different from QBR) is 94.1. His worst career rating prior to Sunday was 121.2...it was 126.9 last year.

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - msqueri - 09-16-2025

(09-16-2025, 08:00 AM)fullmetal Wrote:  I'll take your analysis.  I feel bad for April, but the results seem to show no substantial drop-off.  Whether Thompson's status as primary-DC-in-practice was Reich's idea or whether that was a TT decision that didn't get overturned is of interest since they're both listed as co-DCs.

Bobby April inherited a Stanford defense that had a miserable five year median of #84 and attrition and the portal weren’t doing him any favors when he came in. In April’s first year the defense was #115 and in his second year it was #90. Now this year, with the big caveat that we are only a quarter of the way through, it’s #62. SP+ shows an inherited three year median of #103, first year under April of #116, second year of #112, and quarter of the way through 2025 currently #82. Not as bullish on the defense but the arc of improvement applies to both of these fairly sophisticated measures.

It’s a longer conversation on the merits of bringing Thompson on, the current power-sharing, whether we should consider keeping some or all of the defensive staff, etc. but I just wanted to share that yes, the data does show that the defense has been on an upward trajectory.

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - SkiBum80 - 09-16-2025

(09-16-2025, 11:39 AM)msqueri Wrote:  
(09-16-2025, 08:00 AM)fullmetal Wrote:  I'll take your analysis.  I feel bad for April, but the results seem to show no substantial drop-off.  Whether Thompson's status as primary-DC-in-practice was Reich's idea or whether that was a TT decision that didn't get overturned is of interest since they're both listed as co-DCs.

Bobby April inherited a Stanford defense that had a miserable five year median of #84 and attrition and the portal weren’t doing him any favors when he came in. In April’s first year the defense was #115 and in his second year it was #90. Now this year, with the big caveat that we are only a quarter of the way through, it’s #62. SP+ shows an inherited three year median of #103, first year under April of #116, second year of #112, and quarter of the way through 2025 currently #82. Not as bullish on the defense but the arc of improvement applies to both of these fairly sophisticated measures.

It’s a longer conversation on the merits of bringing Thompson on, the current power-sharing, whether we should consider keeping some or all of the defensive staff, etc. but I just wanted to share that yes, the data does show that the defense has been on an upward trajectory.

The ratings confirm my amateur eye-test that looks like our D is playing tougher and with more physicality, which is what Coach Reich has said multiple times was a goal of this season.  Also the toughness might come out more than even in the stats when you consider bringing it for the most crucial plays, for example, in the BC game in the goal line stand causing a fumble. Also I hope that the trajectory upward is a trend not only over the past 3 seasons but over the past 3 games and continues up from here.

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - Leftcoast - 09-16-2025

It looked like there were a few key injuries and frosh pressed into service on the lines.  Attrition is inevitable but could cause havoc with a young team.  Fingers crossed the young guys are ready for the ACC season physicality.

RE: Sunday morning (err, afternoon) thoughts - Boston College - Papa John - 09-16-2025

(09-16-2025, 10:25 AM)fullmetal Wrote:  I saw his QBR at 55.4 somewhere, but what's a couple of points among fans...(yes, those rankings have to be cumulative/average)

I was quoting PFF ratings, which are distinct from QBR. PFF ratings are generated from video analysis (e.g. accuracy, decision-making) rather than results. QBR, as I understand it, is also context driven but more based on results.