Who are those guys? - Printable Version

Who are those guys? - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Who are those guys? (/thread-3132.html)

Pages: 1 2

Re: Who are those guys? - terry - 03-22-2012

(03-21-2012, 09:02 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:Think of it this way, does the team performance allow you to brag to you kal Barebacker co-workers? I think not. We just beat Cleveland St, Illinois St., and Nevada. yeah.

I think I've enjoyed beating Cleveland St., Illinois St., and Nevada and earnng a trip to Madison Square Garden a lot more than UCBerkeley fans enjoyed losing to South Florida in a play-in game.

Re: Who are those guys? - FarmBoy - 03-22-2012

Quote:I think I've enjoyed beating Cleveland St., Illinois St., and Nevada and earnng a trip to Madison Square Garden a lot more than UCBerkeley fans enjoyed losing to South Florida in a play-in game.

I don't doubt your joy is great, as is mine. But I'm certainly not beating my chest or saying this is what we've been waiting to see from Dawkins and the future is ours. This run gives me hope for the future, but it doesn't make me think more positively about the season past or Dawkins' leadership. In fact, I feel like this team is succeeding despite his in-game coaching at times. Some of the player combinations on the court have left me scratching my head.

Re: Who are those guys? - Robbie - 03-22-2012

(03-22-2012, 12:57 PM)terry link Wrote:I think I've enjoyed beating Cleveland St., Illinois St., and Nevada and earnng a trip to Madison Square Garden a lot more than UCBerkeley fans enjoyed losing to South Florida in a play-in game.

Re: Who are those guys? - 76lsjumb - 03-22-2012

As I understand it, two of the last four in the CBI tourney were Pac-12 teams [with WSU beating OSU to make it to the finals there] and two of the last four in the NIT are Pac-12 teams [and UW beat Oregon to get there], so, whatever else you can say about the Pac-12 this year, we've got those small ponds covered!

The new Pac-12 Men's Basketball marketing slogan:Â The Not-Quite-Ready-for-Primetime Conference.

Re: Who are those guys? - Farm93 - 03-22-2012

(03-22-2012, 02:14 PM)Robbie link Wrote:[quote author=terry link=topic=5736.msg42208#msg42208 date=1332446267]
I think I've enjoyed beating Cleveland St., Illinois St., and Nevada and earnng a trip to Madison Square Garden a lot more than UCBerkeley fans enjoyed losing to South Florida in a play-in game.

One of my co-workers is a big Michigan fan - I posed the question to him of whether he would rather have his team be playing in the NIT in Madison Square Garden, or lose to 13-seed Ohio University in the first round of the NCAAs - he replied unequivocally that the NCAAs is always better. I disagree. I've enjoyed this little run.

Sometimes it's good to be a big fish in a small pond.
[/quote]

There is no doubt that I would rather have "my" team as the #4 seed in the NCAA than play in the NIT.Â That #4 seed implies the team had a pretty good year, and has a decent chance of going to the Sweet 16 or even the Elite 8.Â That's much better than getting lucky in the NIT because the team had a mediocre season.

However, I would rather have "my" team go deep into the NIT than lose early as a 12 seed at the NCAA play in game.Â The seed would imply their regular season would not be that much better than the NIT level season.Â And the deep NIT run could help the team improve for future years.Â Losing in the play-in game does not really help much, IMHO.

The upside was better for C.a.l since C.a.l could have won a couple of games, but as it has turned out Stanford's NIT effort has been pretty sweet.