The CardBoard
Has the Recruiting board reduced recruiting discussion? - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Has the Recruiting board reduced recruiting discussion? (/thread-4380.html)

Pages: 1 2


Re: Has the Recruiting board reduced recruiting discussion? - yvonne - 01-14-2013

Here's the bookmark for the overall board. http://www.thecardboard.org/board.

If you bookmark it instead of the main board, you will see the red mark indicating new messages. I think it's hard to argue that a board with 29 threads and 345 messages has no traffic.

The threads will not be integrated until after signing day.


Re: Has the Recruiting board reduced recruiting discussion? - Extra Point - 01-15-2013

"I think it's hard to argue that a board with 29 threads and 345 messages has no traffic."

If you put all of the posts related to USC football in one location you woulds see more threads and messages.

The problem with a s recruiting page is that it is too closely related to other content. The first message in a thread may be about team performance, for example, but it can easily transition into a recruiting debate. I think it  makes more sense to have separate locations for the major sports. But, I don't think this is a good idea either. There simply isn't enough traffic on the board.


Re: Has the Recruiting board reduced recruiting discussion? - yvonne - 01-15-2013

People asked for a recruiting board. There's a recruiting board.

SMF software doesn't provide a graceful way to move posts when a board is deleted. It's staying for now.