The CardBoard
Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? (/thread-4888.html)

Pages: 1 2

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Extra Point - 03-01-2013

"Given the timing, I'm inclined to think the events in this particular thread may be due to cumulative effects of multiple months of secondhand pot inhalation."

Actually, my post has to do with the frustration of having to wade through hundreds of psychophysiological research papers over the last few years that are padded with mountains of useless pompous verbiage. I'll be more careful about where I release my frustrations in the future.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Kathy - 03-01-2013

(03-01-2013, 12:38 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:Expecting perfection from tweets is asinine, it's not formal communication.

In many respects, tweeting is just as formal a means of communication as is advertising. It's public. Social media has become a significant marketing tool for many businesses. Twitter is full of business accounts. In my company, each publication has its own Twitter account and Facebook page. In the past eight months, we've gone through three people who have washed out as social media producers. Posts with misspelled words and incorrect grammar are image killers in the publications industry. It's unprofessional and makes the company look stupid. To overlook such errors is asinine.


Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - stupac2 - 03-02-2013

Doug Baldwin isn't a company, last time I checked.

Regardless, it's clear that I'm not going to convince you of anything, so fine, look down on him for two typos that were clearly phone autocorrects.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - washingtonismoney - 03-02-2013

Lord knows what the usage police would've done to Joyce, Nabokov, Wallace or Diaz.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - akCard - 03-02-2013

(03-02-2013, 10:17 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:Regardless, it's clear that I'm not going to convince you of anything, so fine, look down on him for two typos that were clearly phone autocorrects.


Isn't autocorrect supposed to eliminate typos?

And "boarder" versus "border" and "remodel" versus "role model" are not typo issues because none of those are misspelled (assuming the first of each pair is what Doug typed in in the first place, that is).

I think the point both Kathy and Yvonne are trying to make is that while u can b undrstd w/o gud spelling, if you want to be taken seriously as a professional, you better have good spelling and grammar skills. If I were to send out an email at work in text-speak or, worse, Twitter-speak, I would get nowhere because the vast majority of my communications are going to either government agencies or employees way above me on the hospital's food chain.

Considering that all but two or three of Doug's tweets were sent in a 30-minute window, it's looking like, despite the good intentions, he may have been drunk tweeting. Or maybe he saw or read something that pushed some buttons. It is the off-season after all so I'm sure he has plenty of time on his hands.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - stupac2 - 03-03-2013

(03-02-2013, 07:02 PM)akCard link Wrote:Isn't autocorrect supposed to eliminate typos?

And "boarder" versus "border" and "remodel" versus "role model" are not typo issues because none of those are misspelled (assuming the first of each pair is what Doug typed in in the first place, that is).
Well, not really, they're mostly supposed to predict what you want to say. So if the thing thinks that "broader" is more likely to occur than "border" it will sub it in, often without telling you (though, of course, this depends on exactly what phone and input program you're using). I believe that "remodel" happened because he missed the space and typed "rolemodel", which the phone thought was closest to "remodel".

As for the other stuff, OF COURSE I agree with that, but the language Baldwin was using here was:
1) In the 99.9999th percentile of twitter users, as far as I can tell.
2) Only containing errors because of missed phone autocorrects.

I think that denigrating him for that is just ridiculous. If you want to complain about "lol ppl r 2 dum 4 me" type messages then I'll be with you every time, but this was just so obviously not that. At some point pedantry just makes you look bad.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - yvonne - 03-03-2013

I see multiple truths in this thread:

1. There is a level of "txt" and twitspeak that is not acceptable in formal context, but is acceptable as slang among youths.
2. Most educated people can code switch between different levels of language, but the less educated cannot.
3. Autocorrect often chooses incorrect words. Knowing correct spelling is still important.
4. Some levels of incorrect spelling and grammar in twitter are considered more egregious than others.


Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Extra Point - 03-03-2013

"Here you simultaneously claim to not see any mutual comprehension and display that same comprehension. You offer a correct interpretation of what he meant by those sentences, which means that you comprehended what he said. He successfully communicated with you. Where is the problem?"

Time was wasted by hundreds of people decrypting these communications, and in the end it made him look dumb.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - 82 Card - 03-03-2013

Althugh I find the autocorrect explanation to be very plausible (having been bitten by autocorrect several times myself), I initially assumed that "remodel" was an intentional clever use of the short text format. I took "remodel" to be a reference to parents expecting a player to help renovate what the parents had not built well in the first place. Of course, the grammar is a bit off for that meaning. So I'm inclined to go with the autocorrect explanation.

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Leftcoast - 03-03-2013

It's twitter - Probably typed on an iPhone and probably banged out in immediate response to we-know-not-what.  Moreover it's better than most the junk we see from athletes using "instant" media.

Baldwin gets a pass from me with a wink acknowledging that I've been there too.

/Lefty - Composed on an iPhone so give me a pass as well?!?

Re: Is it something in the water here in Seattle?? - Robbie - 03-04-2013

(03-03-2013, 08:28 PM)82 Card link Wrote:Althugh I find the autocorrect explanation to be very plausible (having been bitten by autocorrect several times myself), I initially assumed that "remodel" was an intentional clever use of the short text format. I took "remodel" to be a reference to parents expecting a player to help renovate what the parents had not built well in the first place. Of course, the grammar is a bit off for that meaning. So I'm inclined to go with the autocorrect explanation.

I don't think it's auto-correct - I think it's text-to-speech. Creating voice recognition software that can recognize the difference between "boarder" and "border" and "role model" and "remodel" is a very hard problem.