Stanford - UCLA thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UCLA thread (/thread-5870.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UCLA thread (/thread-5870.html)
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
(10-19-2013, 01:12 PM)Fuzzy Dunlop link Wrote:Still getting killed on the edges, just like at Utah and vs UW.
Yeah, this one is puzzling to me. The key to last year's win over Oregon in Autzen was how well the D controlled the edges. This year, though? Ugh....
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - dabigv13 - 10-19-2013
Yes, of course that is true. Still I imagine it's difficult to grow up playing football one way, then have the "emphasis" change on you in the last year or two.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - dabigv13 - 10-19-2013
Great individual effort there by Ty....defense was giving us a run there tho, should've taken it.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
DAG! Think I almost had a minor heart attack there.
But commentators (announcers??) are right: Montgomery has deceptive speed. And great strength while running.
More passes to Ty, please.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - dabigv13 - 10-19-2013
Still seems we are only able to pass the ball downfield when we're not in clear passing downs.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
Nice pressure by the D on the last few drives
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - Cardinal96 - 10-19-2013
Halfway through the 2nd quarter we have held a team scoring over 40 points a game scoreless. D is playing great. Time to take advantage.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
(10-19-2013, 01:12 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Goddamnit! Every game we get a BS roughing the passer call! We might as well just say bad things about their mothers instead of actually trying to hit the quarterback.
Idano, man. Think Chris Spielman saw what I saw: Shayne hesitated for a second but then continued on to hit Hundley. I think that's why the penalty was called.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
NO WILDCAT!!!
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
That was a personal foul??
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - dabigv13 - 10-19-2013
And another BS call....SEC refs call this game and neither of those are called.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - Kathy - 10-19-2013
TV announcers just said UCLA's punter has punted more in this game than he has in all previous games this season.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - dabigv13 - 10-19-2013
Another drive ends with Shaw not willing to throw downfield on 3rd and medium distance...
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - washingtonismoney - 10-19-2013
Last year the read-option on 3rd down killed UCLA. This time they've adjusted. Good try, time to get away from it.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - Cardinal96 - 10-19-2013
Ugh. We are playing not to lose.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - Kathy - 10-19-2013
Punting a lot, too.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - washingtonismoney - 10-19-2013
(10-19-2013, 01:35 PM)NYCCardinalFan link Wrote:Ugh. We are playing not to lose.
I don't think so. As I said, last year Hogan picked up three or four third downs in that way. It's not exactly crazy to see if they've properly adjusted.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - JohnR34231 - 10-19-2013
(10-19-2013, 01:34 PM)dabigv link Wrote:And another BS call....SEC refs call this game and neither of those are called.
Not a big fan of blaming everything on the refs, but that sure looked like a BS call to me, too (and to the announcers).
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - Cardinal96 - 10-19-2013
Omg these refs are screwing us on spots.
Re: Stanford - UCLA thread - akCard - 10-19-2013
I'm normally not one to complain about the refs (it is what it is plus they're making calls at real-time while we have the benefit of super slow-mo replays) but what is up with this crew??