Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 (/thread-9242.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 (/thread-9242.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - dabigv13 - 05-22-2015
Godwin's Law is an internet classic, but it's really a derivative of the earlier described (from the 50's) reductio ad Hitlerum. Which I think also has a funnier name.
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - yvonne - 05-22-2015
Such a BS name for a war in which the first shots were fired by insurrectionists against the US Army.
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - CrazedZooChimp - 05-22-2015
I opened this thread expecting comments about how Johnny Dawkins was causing a sharp drop in donations to the AD, and all I found was a two page discussion about how much it costs to run a golf course (or something, I sort of stopped reading). Can the title of this thread be changed or amended or something?
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - BostonCard - 05-22-2015
(05-22-2015, 02:46 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=12160.msg118865#msg118865 date=1432328911]
[quote author=garvin link=topic=12160.msg118864#msg118864 date=1432328711]
"Haters gonna hate"? This is a discussion of accounting entries. Maybe if this were a biz-school board there would be some haters hating, but even then, we'd probably need a cash vs. accrual subplot to get things going.
Thank you. I think we've gone through the back and forth on this one enough times that I'm just waiting for Godwin's law to take hold.
BC
[/quote]
So are you going to mention the required topic to put this thread to rest?
[/quote]
There must be a corollary to Godwin's law that states that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler, or the invoking of Godwin's law, in order to head off comparisons involving Nazis or Hitler, approaches 1"
We'll call it the Cardboard corollary to Godwin's law.
BC
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - yvonne - 05-22-2015
(05-22-2015, 03:23 PM)ferrari link Wrote:[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=12160.msg118876#msg118876 date=1432333333]
Such a BS name for a war in which the first shots were fired by insurrectionists against the US Army.
Only if you ignore John Brown's black op earlier.
[/quote]
Please. John Brown was long dead by the time the Civil War started. Besides, doesn't that fly in the face of Southerners' other BS that the war wasn't about slavery. (Until you read the actual Articles of Secession).
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - CornFed - 05-22-2015
Uh-oh. Here we go again! This is probably an apt corollary to Godwin's Law as well.
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - yvonne - 05-22-2015
(05-22-2015, 05:22 PM)ferrari link Wrote:... wholly unjustifiable raid....
tells me all I need to know.
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - yvonne - 05-22-2015
Yes, I'll be so much better off knowing you wish I were property.
Re: Stanford Athletics annual report on giving 2013-14 - Stymie - 05-23-2015
(05-22-2015, 04:27 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:[quote author=ferrari link=topic=12160.msg118878#msg118878 date=1432333438]
[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=12160.msg118876#msg118876 date=1432333333]
Such a BS name for a war in which the first shots were fired by insurrectionists against the US Army.
Only if you ignore John Brown's black op earlier.
[/quote]
Please. John Brown was long dead by the time the Civil War started. Besides, doesn't that fly in the face of Southerners' other BS that the war wasn't about slavery. (Until you read the actual Articles of Secession).
[/quote]
I sat next to a Professor of American History at the University of Glasgow at a wedding a few years ago and he refused to let go of his solemn belief that the Civil War was all due to economics and nothing to slavery. He was an idiot.
PS-now it is true that if you traffic in human beings, ir is possible that this trafficking can be considered a subset of "economics," but if you have a conscience, you know better.