Stanford - UW game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UW game thread (/thread-14841.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UW game thread (/thread-14841.html)
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CompSci87 - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:11 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:What a horrendous drive in that situation
Speights tackled by the turf monster. Low throw caught for just under a first down. False start hurrying to get the play off, requiring our last timeout. QB can't find any target to throw to, runs out the clock with a run. Ugh.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CompSci87 - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:11 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:What a horrendous drive in that situation
Speights tackled by the turf monster. Low throw caught for just under a first down. False start hurrying to get the play off, requiring our last timeout. QB can't find any target to throw to, runs out the clock with a run. Ugh.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-10-2017
Some empty calorie yardage in there, but the 184 yards in the first half exceeds the full-game totals of three UW opponents already. They're a very tough defense, as we know. Stanford's 6.5 yards per play is pretty good production irrespective of opponent, of course; UW hasn't allowed more than 4.67 ypp in a full game so far this year.
Of course, the offense overall has slipped up in otherwise makeable plays (three drops, Speights slipping), so this isn't merely Bryce Love being superhuman.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-10-2017
Some empty calorie yardage in there, but the 184 yards in the first half exceeds the full-game totals of three UW opponents already. They're a very tough defense, as we know. Stanford's 6.5 yards per play is pretty good production irrespective of opponent, of course; UW hasn't allowed more than 4.67 ypp in a full game so far this year.
Of course, the offense overall has slipped up in otherwise makeable plays (three drops, Speights slipping), so this isn't merely Bryce Love being superhuman.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Own 25. 45 second and one TO. Odds pretty low. If Speights doesnt fall down they may have picked up 15 or so on that play. Once he did -just get to the half.
(11-10-2017, 10:14 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=17955.msg211641#msg211641 date=1510377081]
What a horrendous drive in that situation
Speights tackled by the turf monster. Low throw caught for just under a first down. False start hurrying to get the play off, requiring our last timeout. QB can't find any target to throw to, runs out the clock with a run. Ugh.
[/quote]
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Own 25. 45 second and one TO. Odds pretty low. If Speights doesnt fall down they may have picked up 15 or so on that play. Once he did -just get to the half.
(11-10-2017, 10:14 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=17955.msg211641#msg211641 date=1510377081]
What a horrendous drive in that situation
Speights tackled by the turf monster. Low throw caught for just under a first down. False start hurrying to get the play off, requiring our last timeout. QB can't find any target to throw to, runs out the clock with a run. Ugh.
[/quote]
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:13 PM)lex24 link Wrote:Fade? BC - .........[/quote]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade. The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasnt intercepted.
BC
The jumpball. Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:13 PM)lex24 link Wrote:Fade? BC - .........[/quote]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade. The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasnt intercepted.
BC
The jumpball. Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - needle - 11-10-2017
Surprised the Washington front seven isn't doing much of what Wazzu did. Not sure that will stay true.
Stanford is in this game because the offense has avoided negative plays and there have been a few damn near spectacular individual efforts. Can the defense hold Washington to fewer points in the second half than in the first? If so, then yes, this game is winnable.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - needle - 11-10-2017
Surprised the Washington front seven isn't doing much of what Wazzu did. Not sure that will stay true.
Stanford is in this game because the offense has avoided negative plays and there have been a few damn near spectacular individual efforts. Can the defense hold Washington to fewer points in the second half than in the first? If so, then yes, this game is winnable.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - RedShift - 11-10-2017
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - RedShift - 11-10-2017
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Or better yet pump fake to outside draw the safety and hit the guy running the post. TE. Not sure which one. Thought he had inside position
(11-10-2017, 10:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219][/quote]
Fade? BC - .........
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade. The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasnt intercepted.
BC
The jumpball. Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Or better yet pump fake to outside draw the safety and hit the guy running the post. TE. Not sure which one. Thought he had inside position
(11-10-2017, 10:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219][/quote]
Fade? BC - .........
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade. The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasnt intercepted.
BC
The jumpball. Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:19 PM)RedShift link Wrote:If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.
I'm not at all confident that'll happen.
Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-10-2017
(11-10-2017, 10:19 PM)RedShift link Wrote:If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.
I'm not at all confident that'll happen.
Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Its a bummer that Bryce got hurt several weeks ago. I dont think you see him in second half. Or next eeek.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017
Its a bummer that Bryce got hurt several weeks ago. I dont think you see him in second half. Or next eeek.
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017
Me neither, but 14-10 at the half is not a bad place to be considering. Would have been nice to get a TD there. But UW defense is the real deal. Our offense hasnt sucked and yet has struggled to move the ball. We have 8 first downs and 6 were earned on a third down, many on third and long, and one on a fourth down. That is a tough way to move the ball.
Bc
Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017
Me neither, but 14-10 at the half is not a bad place to be considering. Would have been nice to get a TD there. But UW defense is the real deal. Our offense hasnt sucked and yet has struggled to move the ball. We have 8 first downs and 6 were earned on a third down, many on third and long, and one on a fourth down. That is a tough way to move the ball.
Bc