Stanford-SC Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-SC Game Thread (/thread-12651.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-SC Game Thread (/thread-12651.html)
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - needle - 09-17-2016
Whew! Not creative, but effective....and hopefully demoralizing to SC.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - rudruff - 09-17-2016
That was awesome.
Bloomgren just handed SC the halftime adjustment.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-17-2016
Did we play a receiver on that drive? Also, no Chryst yet, right?
BC
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - Treefence - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 05:53 PM)rudruff link Wrote:Forgot that all I do is nervously pace in front of the TV until we are up by 2 scores. Welcome back football.I'm convinced football has taken away years from my life and I'm just watching from my couch...
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - rudruff - 09-17-2016
Is it the deafening atmosphere that is causing all these false starts?
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - M T - 09-17-2016
I think they just said 152yds USC, 186 McC from scrimmage.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - M T - 09-17-2016
A trick play? :)
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - 82 Card - 09-17-2016
During last scoring drive, TV announcer said that Stanford sensed fatigue in SC defense and was just running it at them to take advantage. Should be good sign for second half.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 06:31 PM)rudruff link Wrote:Is it the deafening atmosphere that is causing all these false starts?
It's not all that loud here.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 06:34 PM)MT link Wrote:I think they just said 152yds University of Seventh Choice, 186 McC from scrimmage.
Not quite, but he has 108 yards rushing and 65 receiving. Also, he's outscoring SC 14-3. uSC is 0/4 on third down.
BC
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - CompSci87 - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 06:31 PM)rudruff link Wrote:Is it the deafening atmosphere that is causing all these false starts?
It's nice and loud, but not loud enough to explain all those false starts.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-17-2016
Man I hate it when we run out the half like that. We should have a gameplan where each play has a higher chance of points for us than for our opponents. It demonstrates a lack of confidence in our offensive talent, playcalling, or simple laziness.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - CompSci87 - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 06:39 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Man I hate it when we run out the half like that. We should have a gameplan where each play has a higher chance of points for us than for our opponents. It demonstrates a lack of confidence in our offensive talent, playcalling, or simple laziness.
Some people are never satisfied. :D :D
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - needle - 09-17-2016
Great half by McCaffery. Good half by the defense. It would seem that SC could still score some points, especially if they cut down on their penalties.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-17-2016
Yeah, most of the false starts have been on first down, when the crowd is pretty quiet. The atmosphere is a hit subdued, perhaps because it's been a bit of a methodical game with only a couple big plays.
BC
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-17-2016
Halftime show is just mocking usc's band, pretty fantastic.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-17-2016
(09-17-2016, 06:41 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:[quote author=dabigv link=topic=15690.msg171524#msg171524 date=1474162772]
Man I hate it when we run out the half like that. We should have a gameplan where each play has a higher chance of points for us than for our opponents. It demonstrates a lack of confidence in our offensive talent, playcalling, or simple laziness.
Some people are never satisfied. :D :D
[/quote]
Intellectual brutality right? Every play we should be trying to plunge the dagger into SC. Particularly against SC!
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-17-2016
Our D-line is getting pushed. Good thing we have a lead.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - washingtonismoney - 09-17-2016
ILBs Perez and Branch is an odd choice IMO. were pretty poor in that drive.
Re: Stanford-SC Game Thread - rudruff - 09-17-2016
Time to get off the couch . . .