Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - JJJ - 11-09-2019
JJ! Making like JJAW!
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019
I was thinking it was time for Montez to make an error. He obliged my thinking!
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - needle - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:51 PM)JJJ Wrote: JJ! Making like JJAW!
Nice play. Somehow, someway, the offense needs to come alive.
RE: lex24 - martyup - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:52 PM)lex24 Wrote:(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
Yes, and I've seen plenty of targeting ejections.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
What a throw by Costello. My goodness.
What a fantastic route by Wilson to open it up for OSB!
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
Yes, it was. Took a big hit. Marty, take note. :)
(11-09-2019, 01:55 PM)d4cohn Wrote: What a throw by Costello. My goodness.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Right on cue... a time out.
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - JJJ - 11-09-2019
Tuned in late so didn’t see Fisk get injured. Hope he’s ok.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - needle - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 01:58 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Right on cue... a time out.
BC
I'm just hoping for a field goal, honestly. Offense was bailed out by a miracle completion on a third-and-long.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Touchdown Fehoko, though might come back on review.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed. Actually he may have got toe down.
RE: lex24 - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 02:01 PM)lex24 Wrote: Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed
Probably.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle
(11-09-2019, 02:03 PM)lex24 Wrote: I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle. Nope can’t do it. Instead they once again goes towards the sideline to the guy who is the most overrated player I could remember at Stanford in a long time
RE: lex24 - JJJ - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 02:01 PM)lex24 Wrote: Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed. Actually he may have got toe down.
Toe definitely came down first.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
Get close to the goal line and it’s like the goddamn middle of the field doesn’t exist. They got down there with two passes over the middle the field.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019
2nd and 7 and we throw the fade. 3rd and 7 and we throw the fade. Why not just pound the ball to get 7 yards in 2 plays on the ground? What do I know? Dammit.
(11-09-2019, 02:05 PM)JJJ Wrote:(11-09-2019, 02:01 PM)lex24 Wrote: Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed. Actually he may have got toe down.
Toe definitely came down first.
I saw that too. Why didn't the reviewer see it? Sucks!
RE: lex24 - needle - 11-09-2019
Stanford offense did not show up for the first half.
It's a minor miracle that Colorado isn't ahead by a couple of touchdowns.
I don't remember feeling this pessimistic so early about a game since UCF (I didn't watch the UCLA game).
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Austroturf - 11-09-2019
Game certainly not going the way I hoped it would. Instead of a 14-7 lead, we are trailing 7-6. And we even needed a takeaway to be in this position. Not a stellar exploitation of opportunities so far.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
So, it won’t happen. I’d actually love to see Stanford pick up the tempo offensively. Right now they look freaking bored half the time. Or maybe they’re just boring me. Pick the tempo up go fast change things a little bit inject some energy. Try something different. It’s not illegal
Got hammered again. Makes a difference when you hit the quarterback.