The CardBoard
Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread (/thread-12783.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

[Image: RiAyaGRMT.gif]


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - martyup - 09-30-2016

[Image: RiAyaGRMT.gif]


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

This game has illustrated that the preseason narrative that we may have deficiencies at QB and along the OL was not overblown.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

This game has illustrated that the preseason narrative that we may have deficiencies at QB and along the OL was not overblown.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BurgXXIII - 09-30-2016

Well, we don't have to worry Shaw will be poached.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - BurgXXIII - 09-30-2016

Well, we don't have to worry Shaw will be poached.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - doubledub - 09-30-2016

and the spread was -3.5


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - doubledub - 09-30-2016

and the spread was -3.5


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

I don't think Burns has played poorly. Hard to do much when your line can't give you time.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

I don't think Burns has played poorly. Hard to do much when your line can't give you time.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

Christian has decided to handle this himself.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-30-2016

Christian has decided to handle this himself.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 07:59 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:Shaw's comment after the half. "We have to play better" or something to that extent. Ugh. Out played, out coached, out manned. This is awful.

Are we actually getting out-coached? To some extent in any given shellacking it's probably happening, but our guys are just flat-out playing badly. It's not like Washington is doing things we didn't expect and beating us, they're just playing their game and killing us.

At least McCaffrey is still good.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - stupac2 - 09-30-2016

(09-30-2016, 07:59 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:Shaw's comment after the half. "We have to play better" or something to that extent. Ugh. Out played, out coached, out manned. This is awful.

Are we actually getting out-coached? To some extent in any given shellacking it's probably happening, but our guys are just flat-out playing badly. It's not like Washington is doing things we didn't expect and beating us, they're just playing their game and killing us.

At least McCaffrey is still good.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

We just ran up with our TE in the backfield as a blocker. Yup.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - dabigv13 - 09-30-2016

We just ran up with our TE in the backfield as a blocker. Yup.


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - North Woods - 09-30-2016

Goals for the rest of the game:
* Score at least 2 TDs
* Keep them under 40
* McCaffrey >100 yards rushing
* Establish a modicum of a passing game
* No more injuries


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - North Woods - 09-30-2016

Goals for the rest of the game:
* Score at least 2 TDs
* Keep them under 40
* McCaffrey >100 yards rushing
* Establish a modicum of a passing game
* No more injuries


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - cardfan77 - 09-30-2016

Time to put in KJ Costello? ;)


Re: Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread - cardfan77 - 09-30-2016

Time to put in KJ Costello? ;)