Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game

Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game (/thread-14078.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - Scott - 08-26-2017

Stanford 47 - Rice 13

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-26-2017

Man, Hank, you like to cut it close.Â 8 minutes to spare!

BC

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-26-2017

Member	Stanford	Rice	Difference
ColoradoTree	34	13	21
Phogge	45	13	32
bl82	38	14	24
82lsju	38	10	28
DJONES	45	0	45
JJJ	31	10	21
vppolo	37	14	23
Adpaterson	37	6	31
Snorlax94	38	13	25
81alum	27	13	14
Hurlburt88	34	9	25
Needle	26	13	13
Mick	27	3	24
Barrister7	45	17	28
murky	52	10	42
owlcard	38	14	24
Durty Nelly	41	10	31
CompSci87	31	6	25
Sea Loon	33	13	20
ThePOC	34	10	24
winflop	41	13	28
2 for 2028	41	6	35
Publius	40	10	30
thunder_chik	31	13	18
RobinsonsHeave	27	7	20
pcgoode	44	17	27
VFRing98	24	10	14
CPSteeple	27	7	20
vataha	35	13	22
Papa John	42	10	32
SUBuddha	41	18	23
YA_TITTLE	45	13	32
Boston Card	38	17	21
CardinalSagehen	41	10	31
trevmiesterj	34	13	21
CrazedZooChimp	34	14	20
Cornfed	41	7	34
Griffin78	37	6	31
ADPATERSON [Final answer]	44	13	31
FarmBoy	44	19	25
BBM233	26	14	12
TreesAndBirds	35	10	25
qwerty49	34	6	28
martyup	50	14	36
pefloresjr	40	10	30
SamuelMcF	38	17	21
Leftcoast	48	10	38
SamAtoms1980	37	15	22
Indiancardinal	42	6	36
Strid340	41	10	31
Extra Point	31	10	21
Card fan in OR	42	10	32
DC 86	41	10	31
limabean	35	13	22
Cadwallon	38	6	32
CTcard	42	10	32
Palmtree	34	13	21
BigEasyCard	38	10	28
Brannerite	34	10	24
Goodgrief	39	13	26
shinsengumi	37	13	24
Scott	48	13	35
Hank91	31	10	21
Median	38	10	28
Average	37.5	11.1	26.7

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-26-2017

We may eclipse the median predicted score for Stanford by the half.Â Just two TD's away.

BC

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-26-2017

Murky looking good.Â But we all underestimated our scoring against Rice.

BC

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - Cadwallon - 08-26-2017

Really, really glad to be wrong on my prediction.Â Pretty impressed by the play of Cotton.Â Perhaps the defensive line won't be a one man show.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - akiddoc - 08-26-2017

Cap Heresy said 58 - 3. Unless that was edited, it looks like the winner. Left off the list above.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - fullmetal - 08-27-2017

Totally forgot to enter a score.Â Stanford scored way more than I thought Shaw would have let them.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - JohnR34231 - 08-27-2017

(08-27-2017, 02:24 AM)fullmetal link Wrote:Totally forgot to enter a score.Â Stanford scored way more than I thought Shaw would have let them.

Yeah, I thought Shaw would take the foot off the pedal when the score threatened to get out of hand. He didn't.
Nice from the standpoint that we got to see Costello do more than just hand the ball off. As everyone is saying, he looked impressive. Thought the young guys looked very good, although you could be cynical and say anyone can look good against the Rice defense.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - stupac2 - 08-27-2017

Shaw did take his foot off, because he started playing the 2's and 3's. It's just that our 2's and 3's are still much better than Rice, even if they're worse than the ones (ONE PUNT!!!!). In the past in games like this the 2's and 3's weren't able to move the ball so well, leading to the "Shaw so conservative" meme. So either Rice is really bad, or we're really deep. Probably a bit of both.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - JohnR34231 - 08-27-2017

(08-27-2017, 07:12 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:Shaw did take his foot off, because he started playing the 2's and 3's. It's just that our 2's and 3's are still much better than Rice, even if they're worse than the ones (ONE PUNT!!!!). In the past in games like this the 2's and 3's weren't able to move the ball so well, leading to the "Shaw so conservative" meme. So either Rice is really bad, or we're really deep. Probably a bit of both.

I guess it depends on what you mean by "taking your foot off". What I meant was not just taking your first string out, but getting extremely conservative with the play calling and not throwing the ball. We didn't do that, which I think was fine with most of us, because we wanted to see how Costello looked as a passer.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - stupac2 - 08-27-2017

Well, Costello and Burns combined for 13 passes, so it's not like we were chucking the ball all over the field. That seems to me like about what you'd expect for a first game, "let's see what we have" situation.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - Hurlburt88 - 08-27-2017

Seems like we played relatively little ogre, and I don't remember any of the 9 o-linemen formations.Â Moreover--as remarked by someone else IIRC--no wildcat.Â Giving USC more to think about?

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-27-2017

Member..	Stanford..	Rice..	Spread..	Absolute Error..	Spread + Mean error..	Points..
Cap Heresy	58	3	55	8	4	75
murky	52	10	42	13	16.5	74
martyup	50	14	36	19	21.5	73
DJONES	45	0	45	24	22	72
Leftcoast	48	10	38	17	22.5	71
Scott	48	13	35	20	24	70
Renaissance Man	45	10	35	20	27	69
Phogge	45	13	32	23	28.5	68
YA_TITTLE	45	13	32	23	28.5	68
Indiancardinal	42	6	36	21	29.5	66
ADPATERSON	44	13	31	24	30	65
Barrister7	45	17	28	27	30.5	64
2 for 2028	41	6	35	22	31	63
Papa John	42	10	32	23	31.5	62
Cornfed	41	7	34	21	31.5	62
Card fan in OR	42	10	32	23	31.5	62
CTcard	42	10	32	23	31.5	62
pcgoode	44	17	27	28	32	58
Durty Nelly	41	10	31	24	33	57
CardinalSagehen	41	10	31	24	33	57
FarmBoy	44	19	25	30	33	57
Strid340	41	10	31	24	33	57
DC 86	41	10	31	24	33	57
Cardinal Sagehen	41	10	31	24	33	57
washingtonismoney	43	16	27	28	33	57
Las Vegas Spread	40.5	10.5	30	25	34	50
winflop	41	13	28	27	34.5	49
Publius	40	10	30	25	34.5	49
pefloresjr	40	10	30	25	34.5	49
Sonof80sCard	41	13	28	27	34.5	49
Cadwallon	38	6	32	25	35.5	45
standfan	38	6	32	25	35.5	45
Adpaterson	37	6	31	26	37	43
SUBuddha	41	18	23	32	37	43
Griffin78	37	6	31	26	37	43
82lsju	38	10	28	27	37.5	40
BigEasyCard	38	10	28	27	37.5	40
Goodgrief	39	13	26	29	37.5	40
Snorlax94	38	13	25	30	39	37
Treebound	38	13	25	30	39	37
bl82	38	14	24	31	39.5	35
owlcard	38	14	24	31	39.5	35
shinsengumi	37	13	24	31	40.5	33
vppolo	37	14	23	32	41	32
Boston Card	38	17	21	34	41	32
SamuelMcF	38	17	21	34	41	32
qwerty49	34	6	28	29	41.5	29
SamAtoms1980	37	15	22	33	41.5	29
TreesAndBirds	35	10	25	30	42	27
Hurlburt88	34	9	25	30	43	26
ThePOC	34	10	24	31	43.5	25
vataha	35	13	22	33	43.5	25
limabean	35	13	22	33	43.5	25
Brannerite	34	10	24	31	43.5	25
Seattle Tree	34	10	24	31	43.5	25
ColoradoTree	34	13	21	34	45	20
trevmiesterj	34	13	21	34	45	20
Palmtree	34	13	21	34	45	20
CrazedZooChimp	34	14	20	35	45.5	17
lex24	34	14	20	35	45.5	17
CompSci87	31	6	25	32	46	15
Sea Loon	33	13	20	35	46.5	14
JJJ	31	10	21	34	48	13
Bampa	31	10	21	34	48	13
Extra Point	31	10	21	34	48	13
Hank91	31	10	21	34	48	13
thunder_chik	31	13	18	37	49.5	9
Mick	27	3	24	39	50.5	8
RobinsonsHeave	27	7	20	35	52.5	7
CPSteeple	27	7	20	35	52.5	7
Stymie	25	4	21	40	54	5
81alum	27	13	14	41	55.5	4
Needle	26	13	13	42	57	3
BBM233	26	14	12	43	57.5	2
VFRing98	24	10	14	41	58.5	1
Median	38	10	28	27	37.5
Average	37.8	10.9	24.7	28.2	40.5	CORRECT
Actual Scores	62	7	55			75

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - JJJ - 08-27-2017

happy to be so wrong!
thanks for doing this, BC!
8)

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - martyup - 08-28-2017

Where's last year's winner?Â Is Eric spotting us a game just to make it fair?

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - bbm233 - 08-28-2017

Happy to bring up the rear as long as we get the win! However, I gotta refine my methodology going forward as I based it on how many points the kicker would score. I correctly predicted that Toner would be our leading scorer with 14 - but I figured that would be 4 FGs + 2 PATs instead of 2 FGs + 8 PATs.

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - DC 86 - 08-28-2017

(08-28-2017, 10:17 AM)martyup link Wrote:Where's last year's winner?Â Is Eric spotting us a game just to make it fair?

He was the first poster to submit a prediction on this thread (38-10).

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - BostonCard - 08-28-2017

Eric submitted under the name 82lsju, his Bootleg name.Â He was right around the median.

BC

Re: Stanford/Rice cardboard prediction game - martyup - 08-28-2017

(08-28-2017, 03:43 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Eric submitted under the name 82lsju, his Bootleg name.Â He was right around the median.

BC

Figures that Bootleg would screw him.Â ::)