Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) (/thread-18339.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) (/thread-18339.html)
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - martyup - 10-17-2019
FIVE SACKS!
lex24 - lex24 - 10-17-2019
Quick kick
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
Wedington has to hang on to that
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - martyup - 10-17-2019
So far . . . terrible showing by Stanford. Just terrible.
lex24 - lex24 - 10-17-2019
I truly putrid performance. I get it third string quarterback etc. But they’re letting UCLA steam rolling like men against boys. Frankly they should be embarrassed
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
Sad when the biggest hit of the night is by the gatorade cooler.
lex24 - lex24 - 10-17-2019
Yep. Kid makes a nice throw you got to help him
(10-17-2019, 07:15 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Wedington has to hang on to that
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - martyup - 10-17-2019
This is not the team that took down UW. I guess Gaffney didn't come tonight.
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
Miracle! Adebo!
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - martyup - 10-17-2019
Crucial pick. Yes Adebo
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
Stunning clock management again by the braintrust
Come on D, hold them to 3 and score 17 more and I'm in the money!
lex24 - lex24 - 10-17-2019
C’mon. 35 seconds on own 15. With a third string QB that was sacked 5 times. What do you expect. Actually I’m surprised they threw at all.
(10-17-2019, 07:24 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Stunning clock management again by the braintrust
Come on D, hold them to 3 and score 17 more and I'm in the money!
RE: lex24 - JohnR34231 - 10-17-2019
(10-17-2019, 07:16 PM)lex24 Wrote: I truly putrid performance. I get it third string quarterback etc. But they’re letting UCLA steam rolling like men against boys. Frankly they should be embarrassed
Yeah, we are taking a 1-5 team and making them look like a top 15 one.
Hard to believe this is the same team that beat Washington a week and a half ago.
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - martyup - 10-17-2019
We just have to beat them by 12 points in the second half. No problem. We can do it! GO CARD!
RE: lex24 - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
I would have knelt on it from the get go. Instead we try to drive and let 15 seconds run off the clock after a first down. Why not let it all run off if you're heading into the half. The whole sequence made zero sense to me--we're throwing the ball, but not really trying to drive? Perplexing.
(10-17-2019, 07:30 PM)lex24 Wrote: C’mon. 35 seconds on own 15. With a third string QB that was sacked 5 times. What do you expect. Actually I’m surprised they threw at all.
(10-17-2019, 07:24 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Stunning clock management again by the braintrust
Come on D, hold them to 3 and score 17 more and I'm in the money!
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - BostonCard - 10-17-2019
I think it amounted to a few practice plays to loosen West up. You knew UCLA was going to play a soft defense, and I suspect we just wanted to give him a couple of easy completions.
That’s the only thing that makes sense.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 10-17-2019
Ok. I agree with that. I guess they thought maybe they could pop one. Which makes no sense cause they couldn’t do anything.
(10-17-2019, 07:38 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: I would have knelt on it from the get go. Instead we try to drive and let 15 seconds run off the clock after a first down. Why not let it all run off if you're heading into the half. The whole sequence made zero sense to me--we're throwing the ball, but not really trying to drive? Perplexing.
(10-17-2019, 07:30 PM)lex24 Wrote: C’mon. 35 seconds on own 15. With a third string QB that was sacked 5 times. What do you expect. Actually I’m surprised they threw at all.
(10-17-2019, 07:24 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Stunning clock management again by the braintrust
Come on D, hold them to 3 and score 17 more and I'm in the money!
What is this DTR crap? He ain’t good enough to earn initial status
RE: lex24 - towen883 - 10-17-2019
(10-17-2019, 07:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: Ok. I agree with that. I guess they thought maybe they could pop one. Which makes no sense cause they couldn’t do anything.
UNWATCHEABLE
(10-17-2019, 07:38 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: I would have knelt on it from the get go. Instead we try to drive and let 15 seconds run off the clock after a first down. Why not let it all run off if you're heading into the half. The whole sequence made zero sense to me--we're throwing the ball, but not really trying to drive? Perplexing.
(10-17-2019, 07:30 PM)lex24 Wrote: C’mon. 35 seconds on own 15. With a third string QB that was sacked 5 times. What do you expect. Actually I’m surprised they threw at all.
(10-17-2019, 07:24 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Stunning clock management again by the braintrust
Come on D, hold them to 3 and score 17 more and I'm in the money!
What is this DTR crap? He ain’t good enough to earn initial status
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - cardcrimson - 10-17-2019
A thing of beauty like a Bob Ross painting?!? These guys are tad wordy, but kinda funny. My 11 year old daughter, for a short time, was addicted to watching Bob Ross's video. She actually learned a ton!
RE: Next starts soon (UCLA game thread) - BostonCard - 10-17-2019
Just here to note that UCLA had to bring a time out to prevent a delay of game.
BC