FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread (/thread-23662.html)

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

That was PI on Call

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

4th and 17. . . .

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-05-2022

Lol. This is game is just funny, in a gallows humor kind of ways.

BC

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - JJJ - 11-05-2022

Has Daniels leapfrogged Patu on the depth chart? Will he leapfrog McKee??

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

What was that last play?  Let the clock run down to 5 seconds and then throw a sideline pass that could have been intercepted for a pick 6.  What a shite show.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - skip75 - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 01:18 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:  I have been following Stanford football for a long time, and I have never seen anything this bad. Shocking.

Or not since 1984 when Reuben Mayes and the Cougs turned a 42-21 4th quarter deficit into a 49-42 win.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Well, that wasn't impressive after the holding penalty.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - lex24 - 11-05-2022

I’d go with Daniels.  McKee looks lost.  They have a safety playing RB.  Daniels at least gives them a run threat.  Frankly, it can’t be worse…….

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

The Cougs are the worst rushing team in the conference, averaging 83 yards. 133 so far today. . . .

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - old spanish trail - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 01:47 PM)lex24 Wrote:  I’d go with Daniels.  McKee looks lost.  They have a safety playing RB.  Daniels at least gives them a run threat.  Frankly, it can’t be worse…….

You and i would look lost too if we had to run this offense.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Loss of 19. . . .Coug'in it!

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - JeffInCorvallis - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 01:45 PM)skip75 Wrote:  

(11-05-2022, 01:18 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:  I have been following Stanford football for a long time, and I have never seen anything this bad. Shocking.

Or not since 1984 when Reuben Mayes and the Cougs turned a 42-21 4th quarter deficit into a 49-42 win.

I was at that game. Left early.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-05-2022

Shockingly we didn’t give up 32 yards on third and 29.

BC

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Had WSU with 23 points in the prediction pool. I shouldn't root for a safety, should I?

---

Should have rooted for the safety. . . .

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - JJJ - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 01:52 PM)old spanish trail Wrote:  

(11-05-2022, 01:47 PM)lex24 Wrote:  I’d go with Daniels.  McKee looks lost.  They have a safety playing RB.  Daniels at least gives them a run threat.  Frankly, it can’t be worse…….

You and i would look lost too if we had to run this offense.

Nevermind… (Daniels fumbled)

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - PAsportsfan - 11-05-2022

Back to our regular scheduled program…ing.

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - winflop - 11-05-2022

Soooooo f***ing bad

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - PAsportsfan - 11-05-2022

Winflop you posted too soon. Lol

---

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

---