The CardBoard
Stanford - UW game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UW game thread (/thread-14841.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - shinsengumi - 11-10-2017

If we stop the 2pt conversion whenever UW scores the inevitable TD, it should be as good as over. Hope Reid is ok.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - shinsengumi - 11-10-2017

If we stop the 2pt conversion whenever UW scores the inevitable TD, it should be as good as over. Hope Reid is ok.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - stupac2 - 11-10-2017

Anyone see what happened to Reid? It was right in front of me but nothing looked bad live.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - stupac2 - 11-10-2017

Anyone see what happened to Reid? It was right in front of me but nothing looked bad live.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

Reid got trucked.

I’m here all week!


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

Reid got trucked.

I’m here all week!


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - martyup - 11-10-2017

Perez should have stopped that.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - martyup - 11-10-2017

Perez should have stopped that.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CornFed - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 11:48 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.

Definitely was PI.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CornFed - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 11:48 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.

Definitely was PI.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

The good news was Reid was in for the try.  The bad news is he got beat cleanly by Pettis.

BC


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

The good news was Reid was in for the try.  The bad news is he got beat cleanly by Pettis.

BC


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-10-2017

And just like that we've got a football game.

That's ok though, Love hasn't had his 50+ yard TD run yet tonight, so we have that to look forward to as the icing on the cake.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-10-2017

And just like that we've got a football game.

That's ok though, Love hasn't had his 50+ yard TD run yet tonight, so we have that to look forward to as the icing on the cake.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

And just like that.

D ain’t winning this one.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - jacketree - 11-10-2017

And just like that.

D ain’t winning this one.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - stupac2 - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 11:48 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.

Right now bleeding clock is plenty.

Though stopping the two point play would've been really nice. But we just need a couple first downs to ice it, unless they try the onside now, which I don't think they will.


Re: Stanford - UW game thread - stupac2 - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 11:48 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Nah definitely P.I.

Not a particularly great series on D, although some clock has bled.

Right now bleeding clock is plenty.

Though stopping the two point play would've been really nice. But we just need a couple first downs to ice it, unless they try the onside now, which I don't think they will.