The CardBoard
Stanford-Oregon game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-Oregon game thread (/thread-13035.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:21 PM)Mick link Wrote:Keller is looking better at passing.  He looks more comfortable in the pocket, he's trusting his receivers, he's looking off other receivers.  In spite of McCaffrey's drop (which McCaffrey should have had), Chryst did a great job.

He looks *mostly* fundamentally better (aside from his quota-filling short pass to the dirt...) but let's keep in mind this is an awful defense.

Also liking the looks of JJ Arcega-Whiteside. Having a very good freshman season from a player few anticipated would be a positive factor.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - CompSci87 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:22 PM)JJJ link Wrote:Didn't they show Thomas with his ankle wrapped in ice, with announcers saying he's unlikely to come back in?

Yes. Also it's correct that the ankle is what they were looking at on the field.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:21 PM)Mick link Wrote:Keller is looking better at passing.  He looks more comfortable in the pocket, he's trusting his receivers, he's looking off other receivers.  In spite of McCaffrey's drop (which McCaffrey should have had), Chryst did a great job.

And McCaffrey did a great job juking two guys out for a 7 yard run.

I thought Chryst floated that ball when he should've just floated it. That made McCaffrey slow up and have the db time to get there. Maybe that was the design for some reason.

And definitely Thomas's ankle, it was iced up on the sideline. I'd guess he's at least done for the half.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Keller has 150 yards passing.  Why did we need to call two timeouts in a row?

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-12-2016

Can Shaw hire a guy to take care of these delay of game and timeout issues? I mean back to back timeouts. What if the team wants to run a two minute drive. Blergh.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - indiancardinal - 11-12-2016

Hope THOMAS is ok. That did not look good.
This season's injury report has brought us back to earth in a very real way. Just when things seem to be clicking here comes another big blow.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Good thing they called timeout.  They had 13 guys on the field.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

This is getting stupid.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

Thought they were never gonna get that play off.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - CompSci87 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:24 PM)Mick link Wrote:Why did we need to call two timeouts in a row?

Dunno, but somehow it made Oregon call one too.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

What the hell did Rector do?

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:27 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:What the hell did Rector do?

He put his finger to his facemask to shush the crowd, is my guess. Saw it live and thought it might get called.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:He put his finger to his facemask to shush the crowd, is my guess. Saw it live and thought it might get called.

Arcega-Whiteside did the same thing on his TD. unsportsmanlike penalties are mostly dumb. (To call, and to get called.)

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=16088.msg178955#msg178955 date=1478989663]
What the hell did Rector do?

He put his finger to his facemask to shush the crowd, is my guess. Saw it live and thought it might get called.
[/quote]

Ah. Yeah, that'll get a call. I didn't see it.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 03:30 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg178956#msg178956 date=1478989749]
He put his finger to his facemask to shush the crowd, is my guess. Saw it live and thought it might get called.

Arcega-Whiteside did the same thing on his TD. unsportsmanlike penalties are mostly dumb. (To call, and to get called.)
[/quote]

Right, that's a penalty you could probably eliminate to no ill effect. Whatever, hard to complain with gotta this game is going.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - CornFed - 11-12-2016

So, when are we supposed to submit our predictions for the full game score?  ;)

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

CMAC just went over 100!

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

McCaffrey's at 103 yards before the half ends.

Chryst to Rector for a nice gain.  Schultz for 9 yards.

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

[Image: qVVeA.gif]

Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Three TDs for McCaffrey, 14 carries for 131 yards.

38 points.

Offensive line dominating point of attack.

And Stanford gets the ball to start the second half.