Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) (/thread-18472.html)
lex24 - lex24 - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 03:03 PM)lex24 Wrote: Oh my god. I’m done guys. I simply can’t handle this anymore. I’m gonna watch LSU Alabama watch some real ***** football. This is pathetic. Last comment which I’m sure you’ll be glad – all we heard about off-season is how good Saint Brown Wilson and Wedfington are. Well where the ***** are they. Do they ever get the ball in their hands. I mean it’s absolutely absurd.
RE: lex24 - needle - 11-09-2019
If Sanborn had made the kick, I would have predicted a final score of Colo. 31 - Stanford 9.
Now, I think it will be Colorado 31 - Stanford 6.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - stupac2 - 11-09-2019
That drive was infuriating. Taking the kickoff OOB when it would've been a penalty. The personal foul. The ridiculous hold call (I get why it was called, so that was half on St Brown for doing something dumb and half on the ref for throwing a stupid flag), then running on 3rd and 5 to kick on 4th and 3, only to miss. What in the ***** is going on with this team? We're playing like a bunch of morons.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
To be fair, we had eight blockers and they had eight in the box.
Now, that means we only had one receiver wide, and they had three defenders. The issue is that Wilson whiffed on his block and that blew up the play. I think if Wilson does a better job, and Scarlett could have gotten a head of steam inside the play probably would have gotten a first down.
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
Defense with a nice start to the half. Swann with a great tackle to force 3 and out.
RE: lex24 - martyup - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 03:03 PM)lex24 Wrote: Oh my god. I’m done guys. I simply can’t handle this anymore. I’m gonna watch LSU Alabama watch some real ***** football. This is pathetic
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tenor.co%2Fimages...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tenor.co%2Fimages%2F79c83c10e6285c9ea33d9b1c00d9b3b0%2Ftenor.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Hey, a three and out!
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
Costello has no zip on the football. He is clearly not 100%.
RE: lex24 - martyup - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 03:07 PM)needle Wrote: If Sanborn had made the kick, I would have predicted a final score of Colo. 31 - Stanford 9.
Now, I think it will be Colorado 31 - Stanford 6.
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fl4Ho0At2UD2d7WyD6%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
Unreal catch by Parkinson to help out his QB.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Looked pretty good on that play to Parkinson. But yeah, something ain’t right.
BC
Lex, if you are still around, Costello completed a pass to Weddington.
BC
Back to back sacks. That was... ugly.
BC
Delay of game on the punt. Doesn’t matter much, but still...
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019
Is it Mills time?
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - d4cohn - 11-09-2019
Why are we taking a TO, when we are trailing, on a punt?
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Ok, there is literally no reason to call a time out on the punt, especially after a delay of game. What the hell?
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - Phogge - 11-09-2019
Stanford also needs an AD with stones.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019
I thought CO called the TO
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
Nope, we called it.
BC
Next needs to stop!
BC
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - martyup - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 03:21 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Nope, we called it.
BC
Next needs to stop!
BC
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FCDJo4EgHwbaPS%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - chrisk - 11-09-2019
[ul]
[li]undefined[/li]
[/ul]
Joe Burrow and LSU vs Ohio State would be a brobdingnagian story.
The one who got away.
RE: Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread) - BostonCard - 11-09-2019
(11-09-2019, 03:24 PM)chrisk Wrote:Joe Burrow and LSU vs Ohio State would be a of immense proportions story.
- undefined
The one who got away.
So would have Oklahoma and Jalen Hurts against Alabama.
BC