Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
whew they punted
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Gauss - 11-17-2012
Oklahoma is losing, and we're playing Oregon tough. Even if we lose, we might stay in the top-14.
Then beating a 9-2 UCLA would surely seal the deal.
Anyway, let's try to get the more direct route to the Rose Bowl. Let's win this game.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Tycho124 - 11-17-2012
Seriously...why do we bother trying to kick a fieldgoal beyond the 20?
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
Didn't like the call. Go for it. That's what, a 50% chance of 3? Versus a probably 50% of making the 4th, and then either geting 7 later, or a better chance at 3.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
estephan500 - 11-17-2012
Never give Williamson a tricky hash mark FG to make. That goes onto the coach. Recognize our flaws. CAN NOT WAIT TO HAVE A NORMAL KICKER
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Rando - 11-17-2012
Yep I don't like the call either. We can't go to Williamson in the 4th quarter pretty much ever. I don't think we should ever go to him.
We would probably have better results never considering field goals. Or maybe, just maybe using a backup.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
brobdingnagian SACK
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Tycho124 - 11-17-2012
(11-17-2012, 08:53 PM)Rando90 link Wrote:Yep I don't like the call either. We can't go to Williamson in the 4th quarter pretty much ever. I don't think we should ever go to him.
We would probably have better results never considering field goals. Or maybe, just maybe using a backup.
Shaw needs to play like he doesn't have a kicker. Punt or go for it...never go for the field goal until we get another kicker.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Gauss - 11-17-2012
This D is ridiculous.
We'd better score now.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Rando - 11-17-2012
(11-17-2012, 08:55 PM)Tycho link Wrote:[quote author=Rando90 link=topic=6909.msg52513#msg52513 date=1353210797]
Yep I don't like the call either. We can't go to Williamson in the 4th quarter pretty much ever. I don't think we should ever go to him.
We would probably have better results never considering field goals. Or maybe, just maybe using a backup.
Shaw needs to play like he doesn't have a kicker. Punt or go for it...never go for the field goal until we get another kicker.
[/quote]
Yeah I wish we would do just that.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
Defense is playing incredibly well right now. Unbelievably well. Really might be the best defensive performance of the season.
Too bad our offense and coach aren't on their level
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
Wow Hogan.....wow what a throw. O-Line starting to get push now...
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
JohnR34231 - 11-17-2012
If someone told me we'd hold them to 14 points through 3 1/2 quarters I would have said we'd be in pretty good shape.
If some one told me we'd score only 7 I would have said we would be getting blown out.
Oh well.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread - pincemob - 11-17-2012
If this game goes on, Ertz' defense there saved it.Â
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Bruce Wang - 11-17-2012
Derek Mason, NCAA Division 1 Defensive Coordinator of the Year.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Gauss - 11-17-2012
(11-17-2012, 09:01 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Wow Hogan.....wow what a throw. O-Line starting to get push now...
I wonder if Danser's injury has anything to do with that.
He wasn't playing well at the beginning.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Rando - 11-17-2012
1 Yard? LETS GET IT.
Going to be a predictable run up the middle but from Taylor or Hewitt?
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
dabigv13 - 11-17-2012
I think Hogan bootlegs this.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Gauss - 11-17-2012
He has possession, and his jersey touches the ground 1ms before the helmet does.
Touchdown.
Re: Stanford - Oregon Game Thread -
Tycho124 - 11-17-2012
My prediction....they will not be able to overturn the call on the field.