Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
Go for it!!
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
dabigv13 - 11-05-2016
Nice. Plays where we can put CMac one on one with a defender are good plays.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
JJJ - 11-05-2016
Don't know if it was already mentioned, but that's a lot of empty seats for a daytime game on a beautiful NorCal Saturday. ???
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
We need a clean drive with no penalties and no fumbled snaps. We can eat this clock and cap this off.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
CompSci87 - 11-05-2016
It's pretty hot here in the stands. No breeze.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
stupac2 - 11-05-2016
That was a pretty spectacular recovery by Chryst there.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
That faked me out too.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
There is only 3 minutes left in this game and the FS1 announcer called the Beavers Oklahoma State. :o
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
That was close. Could be a TD. The good news is that CMAC had 199 yards before that play. He should go to 200 with that play.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
North Woods - 11-05-2016
Why do they not have a camera looking straight down the goal line at all games? Bad angle to see but it comes up a lot.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
dabigv13 - 11-05-2016
Bad call. Just compare to the positioning of the players on the ground. That was a TD.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
CornFed - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:50 PM)martyup link Wrote:There is only 3 minutes left in this game and the FS1 announcer called the Beavers Oklahoma State. :o
Don't see why we went for it. Now it's a touchdown and 2-pt. extra point and a field goal. Could have been two touchdowns.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
JJJ - 11-05-2016
Stepfan Taylor ND Redux
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
CornFed - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:54 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Bad call. Just compare to the positioning of the players on the ground. That was a TD.
No it wasn't. Certainly was not clear enough on the replay to overturn the call on the field.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:55 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=16045.msg178341#msg178341 date=1478386218]
There is only 3 minutes left in this game and the FS1 announcer called the Beavers Oklahoma State. :o
Don't see why we went for it. Now it's a touchdown and 2-pt. extra point and a field goal. Could have been two touchdowns.
[/quote]
I thought about that too. We could have gone up by 14.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
stupac2 - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:55 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=16045.msg178341#msg178341 date=1478386218]
There is only 3 minutes left in this game and the FS1 announcer called the Beavers Oklahoma State. :o
Don't see why we went for it. Now it's a touchdown and 2-pt. extra point and a field goal. Could have been two touchdowns.
[/quote]
11 and 14 points are barely different, but 14 and 18 points are very different, and they were backed up. Love that call.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
martyup - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:53 PM)martyup link Wrote:That was close. Could be a TD. The good news is that CMAC had 199 yards before that play. He should go to 200 with that play.
ESPN kept him at 199. He should have been given a yard since he put the ball on the one inch line. That will suck if the official yardage is 199.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
dabigv13 - 11-05-2016
I liked the call. You make it three scores. If you make it, game over. If you don't, OSU has the ball on the half yard line.
Re: OSU-Stanford game thread -
JJJ - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 03:56 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=dabigv link=topic=16045.msg178344#msg178344 date=1478386493]
Bad call. Just compare to the positioning of the players on the ground. That was a TD.
No it wasn't. Certainly was not clear enough on the replay to overturn the call on the field.
[/quote]
Of course it's subjective and of course I'm biased, but it looked good to me. Like good enough to reverse the call. imho.