Stanford - Rice game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - Rice game thread (/thread-14131.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - Rice game thread (/thread-14131.html)
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - stupac2 - 08-26-2017
Can we put Costello in? Burn has just not looked good, I want to at least see someone we haven't before.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - doublespiral - 08-26-2017
(08-26-2017, 09:16 PM)Publius link Wrote:Did anybody else catch a glimpse of Arcega-Whiteside dressed on the sideline? That's a good sign.
Shaw mentioned in a pre-game radio interview that JJAW went through warm-ups with the team, but would not play. He seemed to indicate that he was on track to be back soon.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - lex24 - 08-26-2017
is it wrong of me to hope Rice scores
Re: Cripes - thunder_chik - 08-26-2017
(08-26-2017, 08:35 PM)Redrum link Wrote:I love rugby but this whole sideline byplay with announcer and pro rugby player is just a waste. And a reall pisser.Agreed--yugely annoying. Glad my mute button works.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - BostonCard - 08-26-2017
That was some throw from Costello to Smith.
BC
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - GoodGrief - 08-26-2017
holy cow Costello looks good!
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - lex24 - 08-26-2017
Big time arm. And he looks accurate.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - stupac2 - 08-26-2017
(08-26-2017, 09:49 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:holy cow Costello looks good!
Seriously. On target and decisive. Honestly he might even look better than Chryst, though I have no idea if Rice still has the 1's in.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - FarmBoy - 08-26-2017
(08-26-2017, 08:49 PM)Card15 link Wrote:Chip Kelly mentioning Zach Ertz was great. Stanford-Oregon 2012?
KELLY probably thinks about his time coaching Ertz in Philly more than that game.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - martyup - 08-26-2017
Perez is in, even though we wasn't on the depth chart. And . . . Rice is moving the ball. :-\
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - FarmBoy - 08-26-2017
(08-26-2017, 09:51 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=GoodGrief link=topic=17233.msg198092#msg198092 date=1503809342]
holy cow Costello looks good!
Seriously. On target and decisive. Honestly he might even look better than Chryst, though I have no idea if Rice still has the 1's in.
[/quote]
I'd like to see Costello vs the 1s. It's too bad we don't have another warm up game before SC.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - martyup - 08-26-2017
Charity
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - lex24 - 08-26-2017
I have to admit, I'm glad they scored
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - CornFed - 08-26-2017
Rice is overmatched and demoralized. I am delighted that we look so good, but Rice is contributing to this. Have we gotten much real pressure on Rice's qb's? I am soooo looking forward to our game vs. U.S.C. They might actually underestimate us by thinking too much of this is because Rice is so weak.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - JJJ - 08-26-2017
I think Costello elevated himself to #2 today.
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - BostonCard - 08-26-2017
Gotta say, Sydney looks amazing. And for Rice, this is a tough game, but this is a great experience, since it looks like this is the closest they will get to a bowl game.
BC
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread. Playing the Frosh - ADPATERSON - 08-26-2017
No doubt Shaw is using Frosh if they can contribute right away.Â
+ Wedington is a starter (or in a lot), as alternative to B.the.Love.
+ All the TEs are going to be available and pose matchup headaches for LBs.Â
+ Sarell & Little will NOT red-shirt; that seems clear.Â
- Did not see Lund (#25) at RB
- No action by DW Perry at DT (#50)
- Did not see OSt.Brown (#81) at WR... red shirt? Shaw seems happy with the WR/TE Corp.
With Davis Mills waiting in the wings behind Costello, and Tonner McKee (6'6" 220) lined up for 2018, we are solid at QB through 2022.Â
Agree with comments above -- Costello > Burns.Â
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - BostonCard - 08-26-2017
McKee will take a mission, so he might as well be a 2020 QB.
BC
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - BostonCard - 08-26-2017
The amazing stat is that we have Over 350 yards of passing offense, yet no receiver has more than 60 yards.
BC
Re: Stanford - Rice game thread - martyup - 08-26-2017
Weddington is putting on a clinic.