Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread (/thread-12707.html)

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016

I would like to see more Chryst in the second half.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - HisKneeWasDown - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:41 PM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=ThePOC link=topic=15750.msg172671#msg172671 date=1474767375]
Awful game management there. Absolutely no justification for taking three timeouts into the locker room.

My guess is that with the way the offense has been playing Shaw thought we just needed to go in the locker room and regroup.
[/quote]

That's actually a fair point. hard to know the sense of the sideline from where I'm sitting (comfortably in a bar stool at the Buck/Cardinal watch party...)

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - OutsiderFan - 09-24-2016

They need to run more designed runs with Burns so they can have him zone read.  And they also need to roll him out.  I didn't think Tucker could be trusted at LT.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - needle - 09-24-2016

I feel like the defense is playing well so far. UCLA will try to pick on Alexander. I think Rosen is good for a pick, however.

The offense looks bad. Not awful, but bad penalties, UCLA is disrupting the passing attack with pressure (half of that is on Burns holding on to the ball too long). I would like to see fewer formations and a little bit of tempo. UCLA defense is not all-world.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - martyup - 09-24-2016

CMAC should cheat up on the kickoffs.  If he could catch one of those on the run . . .

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - cardcrimson - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:50 PM)martyup link Wrote:CMAC should cheat up on the kickoffs.  If he could catch one of those on the run . . .

I hope he doesn't have another chance.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - CrazedZooChimp - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:45 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:They need to run more designed runs with Burns so they can have him zone read.  And they also need to roll him out.  I didn't think Tucker could be trusted at LT.

Well, he's at RT and Hall has been beat twice (at least), so...you got your wish I guess?

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - SeattleTree - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:51 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=15750.msg172689#msg172689 date=1474768225]
CMAC should cheat up on the kickoffs.  If he could catch one of those on the run . . .

I hope he doesn't have another chance.
[/quote]

Exactly. Why would you want CMac to return another kickoff? Let's go for a 2nd half shutout.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - HisKneeWasDown - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:53 PM)SeattleTree link Wrote:[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=15750.msg172690#msg172690 date=1474768312]
[quote author=martyup link=topic=15750.msg172689#msg172689 date=1474768225]
CMAC should cheat up on the kickoffs.  If he could catch one of those on the run . . .

I hope he doesn't have another chance.
[/quote]

Exactly. Why would you want CMac to return another kickoff? Let's go for a 2nd half shutout.
[/quote]

Maybe we trade TDs for FGs. but y'all are right.  shutout!!!

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - doubledub - 09-24-2016

Im trying to follow tje game with shoddy internet on a transatlantic flight. I need a little help:

Has chryst played?
Is tucker at RT or LT
Is hoffpauir still playing nickel?

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - martyup - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:53 PM)SeattleTree link Wrote:[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=15750.msg172690#msg172690 date=1474768312]
[quote author=martyup link=topic=15750.msg172689#msg172689 date=1474768225]
CMAC should cheat up on the kickoffs.  If he could catch one of those on the run . . .

I hope he doesn't have another chance.
[/quote]

Exactly. Why would you want CMac to return another kickoff? Let's go for a 2nd half shutout.
[/quote]

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:57 PM)double e dub link Wrote:Im trying to follow tje game with shoddy internet on a transatlantic flight. I need a little help:

Has chryst played?
Is tucker at RT or LT
Is hoffpauir still playing nickel?

Chryst played one series.

BC

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - CrazedZooChimp - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 06:57 PM)double e dub link Wrote:Im trying to follow tje game with shoddy internet on a transatlantic flight. I need a little help:

Has chryst played?
Is tucker at RT or LT
Is hoffpauir still playing nickel?

Yes, 1 series (3rd one, I think).
RT, Hall is at LT.
Not sure, have to see where he lines up, but I think he's been out for most series'.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016

Big sack!

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - CrazedZooChimp - 09-24-2016

Boom! More of that please.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - martyup - 09-24-2016

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016

Here we go offense.

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - PalmTree - 09-24-2016

I have to agree with TP - -if Burns can't  get it done in 2-3 series, I'd go with Cryst. He can't do any worse

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - jacketree - 09-24-2016

Nice pressure.

Offensive takedown on the edge?

---

Re: Stanford at UCLA Game Thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 09-24-2016

(09-24-2016, 07:02 PM)PalmTree link Wrote:I have to agree with TP - -if Burns can't  get it done in 2-3 series, I'd go with Cryst. He can't do any worse

Am I TP?

---