Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
jacketree - 11-19-2016
Mac won't be coming out. Not with this porous defense and quick strike capability on the other side.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
HisKneeWasDown - 11-19-2016
The Axe!!
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
HisKneeWasDown - 11-19-2016
That #99 is a big dude
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:11 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Mac won't be coming out. Not with this porous defense and quick strike capability on the other side.
Right. He should do a lot more damage to the stat sheet before the clock hits :00.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
Mick - 11-19-2016
How many sacks, TFL, knockdowns does Stanford have against Webb?
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
jacketree - 11-19-2016
Uh guys. Single score game with more than a quarter left.
31 points won't win this.
Atrocious tackling.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
martyup - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:14 PM)Mick link Wrote:How many sacks, TFL, knockdowns does Stanford have against Webb?
ZeroÂ
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
JohnR34231 - 11-19-2016
Looks like we're going to have to keep scoring. But you knew that.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
SeattleTree - 11-19-2016
Why does it seem like Chryst/Burns are constantly having balls batted down at the line of scrimmage, but Webb is not only untouched, none of his passes get batted down?
CMac is going to have to get 400 for the Trees to get the win, because the defense has no answer for draws/screens and is apparently unwilling to tackle.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:18 PM)SeattleTree link Wrote:Why does it seem like Chryst/Burns are constantly having balls batted down at the line of scrimmage, but Webb is not only untouched, none of his passes get batted down?
The Stanford OL is poor, as has been the pass rush today.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
JJJ - 11-19-2016
My friend tells me the rushing record for a game is 427. Jus' sayin'...
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
jacketree - 11-19-2016
Like California's jumbo better than ours. Flare passes in the flat to a 350 pounder.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
jacketree - 11-19-2016
One too few blockers
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
Mick - 11-19-2016
Well, Kall clearly has figured out how to tackle the bubble screen.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:21 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Like California's jumbo better than ours. Flare passes in the flat to a 350 pounder.
Wonder what kind of hands Herbig has.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
jacketree - 11-19-2016
Guess I'll be more comfortable with a 4 TD lead, but strong answer.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
BostonCard - 11-19-2016
As long as we keep scoring.
Bc
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
JohnR34231 - 11-19-2016
It's come down to what team can break the other one's serve.
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
BostonCard - 11-19-2016
A turnover right about now would be great.
BC
Re: Stanford-×ÉÉ game thread -
shinsengumi - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:21 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Like California's jumbo better than ours.
Yea, we've only run for ~200 yards from our heavy packages today. :)