Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford @ UCLA predictions (/thread-12672.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford @ UCLA predictions (/thread-12672.html)
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - BostonCard - 09-29-2016
Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - BostonCard - 09-29-2016
Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - BostonCard - 09-29-2016
Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - MSmith23 - 09-30-2016
(09-29-2016, 06:41 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Got it. Thank you again for doing this!
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - MSmith23 - 09-30-2016
(09-29-2016, 06:41 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Got it. Thank you again for doing this!
Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - MSmith23 - 09-30-2016
(09-29-2016, 06:41 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Sorry guys, I had meant to update the spreadsheet, but then the site was down for the upgrade and I didn't get to it until now.
WIM, you tied for fourth with a mean + spread error of 5 giving you 72 points (nice job).
MSmith23 you had an error of 14, giving you 28 points.
After the UW game, I will post up the aggregate standings through four games. I will say that through 3 games, eric is running away with it, scoring 70+ points in all three games.
BC
Got it. Thank you again for doing this!