Stanford - UDFG game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UDFG game thread (/thread-12865.html)

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - needle - 10-15-2016

Yes! Meeks definitely not running at 100 percent, but goes in for the pick six!

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - martyup - 10-15-2016

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - BostonCard - 10-15-2016

Our best offense may be our defense.

BC

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - jacketree - 10-15-2016

;D

So will the offense score?

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - thunder_chik - 10-15-2016

(10-15-2016, 06:28 PM)SamAtoms1980 link Wrote:QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No flags!  ;D

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - needle - 10-15-2016

I'd imagine Tucker will give it a go with Bright out. Fingers crossed, but maybe this isn't a game-changing loss.

Hope Bright is OK. I did not see when he got injured.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - Langdude - 10-15-2016

Did anyone notice who played RT with Bright out?

-m.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - BostonCard - 10-15-2016

I swear, i thought there was a brief period where everyone gave up on the play.  Then Meeks started up again.

BC

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - French Rage - 10-15-2016

Can we put Meeks on offense in some way? :P

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - BostonCard - 10-15-2016

(10-15-2016, 06:30 PM)Langdude link Wrote:Did anyone notice who played RT with Bright out?

-m.

Tucker has been playing, so i am guessing it was him.  However, we haven't had an offensive series since the Bright injury was disclosed, so it's tough to tell.

B C

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-15-2016

(10-15-2016, 06:28 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Our best offense may be our defense.

BC

Over the past 2.5 football games I believe the score is 15-14 offense, so you're not far off.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-15-2016

(10-15-2016, 06:32 PM)French Rage link Wrote:Can we put Meeks on offense in some way? :P

His field vision on that return was impressive.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - washingtonismoney - 10-15-2016

Coaches really need to stop playing Branch and Perez, together or indeed at all.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - martyup - 10-15-2016

Two illegal blocks in the back on that 1st down pass.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - BostonCard - 10-15-2016

That screen was painfuyl to watch.

BC

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - Stymie - 10-15-2016

(10-15-2016, 06:19 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:It's a fair point, but the people who made the decision have a lot more data points than we do. 

Having more data points is not necessarily an advantage if the holders of the data points do not have proper algorithms or the nous to understand what those data points mean.  My working life was successful because as an outsider I could identify the incredibly stupid misunderstandings of reality by the powers that be.  Just because Stanford Football is just football doesn't mean that the powers that be there who know more about football than we do are infallible.

Remember NASA and the Challenger disaster?  I do.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - washingtonismoney - 10-15-2016

Except for the DBs and Thomas, this defense is of really poor quality. Leaves so many plays on the field.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - martyup - 10-15-2016

Perez is lost again.

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - BostonCard - 10-15-2016

Yes!

Another INT.

BC

---

Re: Stanford - UDFG game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-15-2016

Kizer is melting down.

---