The CardBoard
Stanford-Oregon game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-Oregon game thread (/thread-13035.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ChicagoCard - 11-12-2016

Great thing about that interception: Solomon Thomas had no problem coming all the way over to congratulate Alfieri on the sideline.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - washingtonismoney - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Checking the replay of Chryst's TD pass to Rector, the Oregon DT was very clearly diving at Chryst's braced knee.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

Come on Hall


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - dabigv13 - 11-12-2016

Gah so many delay of game/wasted TOs!

Somehow we have to fix that.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Bryce Love is looking really good.  Can't wait until next year.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:32 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179002#msg179002 date=1478993385]

You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.
[/quote]

Then again, we're averaging 1.3 yards per play more than they are. So we're also outplaying them.

Incidentally, espn's mobile website is garbage. Just finding our box score took me fifteen minutes. I really cannot believe how horrible it is.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:45 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=16088.msg179008#msg179008 date=1478993563]
[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179002#msg179002 date=1478993385]

You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.
[/quote]

Then again, we're averaging 1.3 yards per play more than they are. So we're also outplaying them.

Incidentally, espn's mobile website is garbage. Just finding our box score took me fifteen minutes. I really cannot believe how horrible it is.
[/quote]

Try the Yahoo Sports app, if you have a smartphone.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

[Image: pvll5nhvjw7mc7ipgwnv.gif.9bdd2491d3642f3...d56740.gif]


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - CompSci87 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:45 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=16088.msg179008#msg179008 date=1478993563]
[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179002#msg179002 date=1478993385]

You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.
[/quote]

Then again, we're averaging 1.3 yards per play more than they are. So we're also outplaying them.

Incidentally, espn's mobile website is garbage. Just finding our box score took me fifteen minutes. I really cannot believe how horrible it is.
[/quote]

Register a free account and make Stanford Football one of your favorite teams. Then you can get there quickly from the Favorites tab.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - French Rage - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:32 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179002#msg179002 date=1478993385]

You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.
[/quote]

Yeah but both were poorly-floated somewhat-desperation passes by the Oregon QB.  If you can force them into those kinds of passes, you create your own luck.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

[Image: 200_s.gif]

To the house!


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - French Rage - 11-12-2016

Never thought I'd say this but...

can we play Oregon every week?


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 11-12-2016

Not to jinx anything, but the current margin matches the all-time biggest margin for Stanford in this series: 39 points (set in 1981).


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

LOVE to watch Love.  that dude can run!


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - stupac2 - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:49 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179013#msg179013 date=1478994319]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=16088.msg179008#msg179008 date=1478993563]
[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=16088.msg179002#msg179002 date=1478993385]

You mean because we've had flunky turnovers go only our way?

Exactly that. Even skilled turnovers -- like Alfieri's latest pick -- are pretty volatile.
[/quote]

Then again, we're averaging 1.3 yards per play more than they are. So we're also outplaying them.

Incidentally, espn's mobile website is garbage. Just finding our box score took me fifteen minutes. I really cannot believe how horrible it is.
[/quote]

Register a free account and make Stanford Football one of your favorite teams. Then you can get there quickly from the Favorites tab.
[/quote]

Yeah I've done that but logging in just froze. I'm telling you, the website is terrible.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - dabigv13 - 11-12-2016

Love really is a very entertaining runner to watch. I love it when they give you an angle to see his eyes.


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - martyup - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 02:32 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Marty... Love the gifs!

BC

Somebody doesn't.  I've been down voted during this game.  :(


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - Mick - 11-12-2016

Cameron Scarlett and we break the 50 point level!!!


Re: Stanford-Oregon game thread - French Rage - 11-12-2016

(11-12-2016, 04:59 PM)Mick link Wrote:Cameron Scarlett and we break the 50 point level!!!

***** it let's go for 70!