The CardBoard
Stanford-UCLA game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-UCLA game thread (/thread-10242.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - yvonne - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 06:21 AM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=13193.msg134952#msg134952 date=1444996433]
[quote author=TheFarm07 link=topic=13193.msg134950#msg134950 date=1444994801]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=13193.msg134949#msg134949 date=1444990319]
[quote author=needle link=topic=13193.msg134932#msg134932 date=1444976065]
Props to Rosen for seeking out Shaw. That's a sign of maturity.

I actually think I'm rooting for the kid.

I have yet to see any behavior from Rosen during a game that would indicate he has some sort of attitude problem.
Hey, the guy wanted to come to Stanford. he can't be all bad.
[/quote]

Did someone already post this link?

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/ucla-bruins-stanford-cardinal-josh-rosen-dream-school-101515

Maybe he's grown wiser in his old age :)

But seriously, he looked pretty good last night. UCLA has a great QB for the next couple years.
[/quote]

I think we've all read those stories about how Rosen's ego and attitude in the camps made people question just how coachable he was. I was just pointing out that I have seen him play in some of the UCLA games and I have yet to see any behavior from him that would make me question his attitude, or his ability to get along with coaches and teammates.
So maybe he has matured.
[/quote]

How about Josh Rosen as a fifth year senior transfer QB? 8)
[/quote]

That would require him sitting out a year, most likely from injury. I don't wish that on anyone.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - GoodGrief - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 09:51 AM)French Rage link Wrote:And most importantly, I made it on TV with my sign.

There was almost something anti-climatic about C-Mac breaking Toby's record.  Sort of maybe a comment on how far the program has progressed since then.  When Toby did it, it was the highlight of his should-have-been-Voldemort campaign, it was our first home win against a top 25 team in who knows how long, and it made it bowl eligible for the first time in 8 years.  The whole game was amazing and the record was the cherry on top.  But the way things have gone since then, it's seems like yeah of course we'll be able to break some of our own records, duh.  And while this was a great high profile game and great win, it feels like just another solid game from what is shaping up to be a solid team; unlike the 2009 Oregon game this one maybe won't stand out from the other games this year to go on some wall of fame.

Congrats French Rage, which was your sign?

Yeah, I felt similarly about C-Mac's record. Toby got his record with what felt like 40 carries, 5-6 yards at a time while carrying 3-5 defenders and grinding himself through and into the dirt. C-Mac's record felt like it came so much more easily, with nimble footing and big gains.

It was like Gimli and company slogging through the snow over the Mountains of Moria while Legolas walked on top of the snow.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - French Rage - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 12:21 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:[quote author=French Rage link=topic=13193.msg134987#msg134987 date=1445014265]
And most importantly, I made it on TV with my sign.

There was almost something anti-climatic about C-Mac breaking Toby's record.  Sort of maybe a comment on how far the program has progressed since then.  When Toby did it, it was the highlight of his should-have-been-Voldemort campaign, it was our first home win against a top 25 team in who knows how long, and it made it bowl eligible for the first time in 8 years.  The whole game was amazing and the record was the cherry on top.  But the way things have gone since then, it's seems like yeah of course we'll be able to break some of our own records, duh.  And while this was a great high profile game and great win, it feels like just another solid game from what is shaping up to be a solid team; unlike the 2009 Oregon game this one maybe won't stand out from the other games this year to go on some wall of fame.

Congrats French Rage, which was your sign?
[/quote]

"C-Mac Attack"

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - GoodGrief - 10-16-2015

oh yeah, I remember that sign, nice job! (glad that Stanford Stadium allows signs--I remember being not allowed to bring in my "WE BELIEVE IN STANFORD FOOTBALL" sign during the dark Wlat years.)

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - French Rage - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 12:35 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:oh yeah, I remember that sign, nice job! (glad that Stanford Stadium allows signs--I remember being not allowed to bring in my "WE BELIEVE IN STANFORD FOOTBALL" sign during the dark Wlat years.)

I get the occasional checker at the gate not sure if I can bring them in, but after a little convincing they'll let me in with them.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-16-2015

Rosen, last night: 22/42, 325 yds, 3 td 2 int
Hogan's stats extrapolated to 42 pass attempts: 22/42, 364 yds, 8 td 3 int  :D

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - CrazedZooChimp - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 12:21 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:[quote author=French Rage link=topic=13193.msg134987#msg134987 date=1445014265]
And most importantly, I made it on TV with my sign.

There was almost something anti-climatic about C-Mac breaking Toby's record.  Sort of maybe a comment on how far the program has progressed since then.  When Toby did it, it was the highlight of his should-have-been-Voldemort campaign, it was our first home win against a top 25 team in who knows how long, and it made it bowl eligible for the first time in 8 years.  The whole game was amazing and the record was the cherry on top.  But the way things have gone since then, it's seems like yeah of course we'll be able to break some of our own records, duh.  And while this was a great high profile game and great win, it feels like just another solid game from what is shaping up to be a solid team; unlike the 2009 Oregon game this one maybe won't stand out from the other games this year to go on some wall of fame.

Yeah, I felt similarly about C-Mac's record. Toby got his record with what felt like 40 carries, 5-6 yards at a time while carrying 3-5 defenders and grinding himself through and into the dirt. C-Mac's record felt like it came so much more easily, with nimble footing and big gains.

It was like Gimli and company slogging through the snow over the Mountains of Moria while Legolas walked on top of the snow.
[/quote]

My friend and I also discussed this, I think the Toby game stood out more because he basically carried us to a win that game (along with a bunch of Oregon players).  It was obvious without Toby we would not have won, maybe wouldn't have been close.  Whereas last night, as amazing as C-Mac is, I'm not sure we would have been that much worse off with, for example, Barry J getting all those carries. 

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - 82 Card - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 05:06 AM)FarmBoy link Wrote:Chance of winning out 16%
Chance of winning Pac12 54%

http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/fpi/_/id/24/stanford-cardinal

I checked out their numbers for some of the other schools on our schedule. It looks like they are projecting the most likely conference championship match-up to be Stanford against the Spoiled Children. They have Utah with only a 25% chance of beating the spoiled children. I don't see how they can rate the spoiled children so highly.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - stupac2 - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 03:24 PM)82 Card link Wrote:I don't see how they can rate the spoiled children so highly.

Because on a per-play basis they're very good, almost as good as we are. In the analyses BC and others were doing before last night's game USC was consistently just behind us. I think this might be a case where a mid-season coaching change actually improves a team quite a bit. This weekend is a huge test for them.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - washingtonismoney - 10-16-2015

https://twitter.com/ToddHusak/status/655144386053824513

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 06:11 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:https://twitter.com/ToddHusak/status/655144386053824513

Glad to see I'm not totally insane for making the Rosen-Rodgers connection.

Re: Stanford-UCLA game thread - CTcard - 10-16-2015

(10-16-2015, 06:11 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:https://twitter.com/ToddHusak/status/655144386053824513

I don't think that Stanford's DBs are outstanding as a group at this time - maybe as high as good. I saw the DBs defend a lot of passes and I saw a lot of UCLA receivers running somewhere between poorly and un-covered.

The large number of passes defended makes me think that they'll eventually get there, after all everyone but Harris is basically seeing their first extended playing time.  But DBs have to be consistent, mistakes one out of three plays leads to the other team scoring a ton.Â