The CardBoard
CCG Discussion Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: CCG Discussion Thread (/thread-10941.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - Sea Loon - 12-05-2015

Well, Shaw committed to go for 4th. Sometimes it fails. Sometimes it's spectacular.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - cardfan77 - 12-05-2015

U.SC's players are nothing but thugs.  They can start making their way back to Watts.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - cardfan77 - 12-05-2015

Who else loves Roses?  I sure do!

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - SamAtoms1980 - 12-05-2015

Good win, but we're going to have to take it up an echelon against Ohio State.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - BostonCard - 12-05-2015

When was the last time a team had two players throw a TD, rush for a TD, and receive a TD.

BC

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - gocard14 - 12-05-2015

(12-05-2015, 09:11 PM)cardfan77 link Wrote:U.SC's players are nothing but thugs.  They can start making their way back to Watts.

I'm hardly a fan of most of USC's players (see Shuster swinging at Harris), but am wary about using that word after hearing Richard Sherman's wise comments about how we selectively apply that word to black individuals who don't conform to certain standards of behavior.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - cardfan77 - 12-05-2015

Both Football and Futbol teams prevail!  Great day to be a Stanford man/woman.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - socalstanfan1 - 12-05-2015

I think, barring a 4Q comeback by UNC, we end up jumping Ohio State and the Big-10 Runner up, and land 5th in the final rankings, perhaps with a feeling among many that we would be more deserving than the Big-10 champ, since both of those teams look pretty unimpressive, at least offensively.  But, we missed our chance when we slipped up against Oregon.  Oh well, that game will certainly add fuel to the Pac-12 North powers.

Really, really proud of how this team played this year.  They developed really nicely.  We have one more, Big Daddy Bowl Game to go, and I suppose we will get to prove ourselves against Ohio State, though maybe the loser of today's Big-10.  One more chance to show how good the team is. 

Next year, we lose some star power on the DL and LB corps, but I think we will be ok.  And of course Hogan will be an enormous loss.  But McCaffery, Love, young receivers, the TE corps...I'm already looking forward to next season's adventure. After we pick us some Roses, of course.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - JohnR34231 - 12-05-2015

Nice victory! We were tough when we had to be.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - Cardinal96 - 12-05-2015

I am so proud of this team.  Our coach, our players, our staff.  Just a pleasure to watch them play this season.  They play with fire and heart.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - Mick - 12-05-2015

(12-05-2015, 09:11 PM)cardfan77 link Wrote:U.SC's players are nothing but thugs.  They can start making their way back to Watts.


Speaking oF USC players, I just thought I check out their academic majors:

39 Undeclared
23 Communications majors
15 Sociology
8  Business administration (not throwing stones, I did that undergrad)
8  Policy, Planning and Management
5  Majors with the word "Science" in them (two Social Science, two Political Science, one Health and Human Science
3  Economics
3  Psychology (most popular undergrad major, countrywide)
1  Human biology
1  Majors with the word "Engineer(ing)" in them
1  Theater arts
1  Broadcast journalism

7 are pursuing Master's degrees

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - amartinsu13 - 12-05-2015

Isn't this also the single game Stanford record for all purpose yards?  Pretty sure he's never had that many before. 

And only the 5th player in FBS HISTORY to run for 200 and have 100 receiving. 

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - amartinsu13 - 12-05-2015

SportsCenter giving us 10 minutes of nothing but love right now.

Saying McC DESERVES to win the Voldemort.  Saying Stanford has as good of a resume as ANY team in the country. 

Love this team!

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - thunder_chik - 12-05-2015

Our team is AMAZING!!!  I am so proud of them!  ;D

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - Mick - 12-05-2015

(12-05-2015, 09:21 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=cardfan77 link=topic=13917.msg145966#msg145966 date=1449375067]
U.SC's players are nothing but thugs.  They can start making their way back to Watts.


Speaking oF Unbelievably Spoiled Children players, I just thought I check out their academic majors:

39 Undeclared
23 Communications majors
15 Sociology
8  Business administration (not throwing stones, I did that undergrad)
8  Policy, Planning and Management
5  Majors with the word "Science" in them (two Social Science, two Political Science, one Health and Human Science
3  Economics
3  Psychology (most popular undergrad major, countrywide)
1  Human biology
1  Majors with the word "Engineer(ing)" in them
1  Theater arts
1  Broadcast journalism

7 are pursuing Master's degrees
[/quote]

Stanford roster majors by comparison

46 Undeclared
3  Communications majors
0  Sociology
n/a  Business administration (Stanford doesn't offer it)
4  Public Policy
19  Majors with the word "Science" in them
3  Economics
5  Psychology (one was pre-med)
5  Human biology
2  Earth Systems
11 Majors with the word "Engineer(ing)" in them
0  Theater arts
0  Broadcast journalism
1  Product Design
1  Symbolic Systems
1  Architectural Design


Re: CCG Discussion Thread - Mick - 12-05-2015

Too much love for this Stanford team.  I can't wait for the Rose Bowl and the Voldemort announcement...

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - ChicagoCard - 12-05-2015

(12-05-2015, 09:04 PM)NYCCardinalFan link Wrote:I say go for it.  I don't want to risk getting the FG blocked and we have a 50/50 chance of making it which is game over.

Yeah, the 2013 Oregon game featured a FG block by Oregon and a lucky bounce setting up an easy TD.

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - BostonCard - 12-05-2015

(12-05-2015, 09:22 PM)amartinsu13 link Wrote:Isn't this also the single game Stanford record for all purpose yards?  Pretty sure he's never had that many before. 

And only the 5th player in FBS HISTORY to run for 200 and have 100 receiving.

Did any of them also throw for a TD?

BC

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - BostonCard - 12-05-2015

Did anyone see the onsides kick by North Carolina.  Ruled offsides, but seemed pretty legal to me.

BC

Re: CCG Discussion Thread - dabigv13 - 12-05-2015

That was a pretty unbelievable call. Wasn't even close.